A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
The article Leaders Who Confuse Being Liked With Being Respected from Admired Leadership highlights a subtle but important leadership challenge: the tendency for leaders to equate popularity with effectiveness. While being liked can contribute to positive relationships, the article argues that respect—not approval—is the foundation of strong leadership. For school administrators, department chairs, and teacher leaders, this distinction is especially important when guiding teams through change, addressing performance concerns, or making difficult decisions that affect students and staff.
The authors emphasize that likeability and respect are not the same quality, even though they may overlap. Staff members may enjoy working with leaders who are supportive, personable, and approachable. However, respect is earned through competence, fairness, consistency, and the ability to make sound decisions under pressure. When leaders assume that being liked automatically signals effectiveness, they may unintentionally avoid behaviors that are necessary for organizational success.
In educational settings, this challenge often emerges when leaders hesitate to address underperformance, avoid difficult conversations, or delay decisions that may initially be unpopular. Leaders who prioritize being liked may seek consensus at all costs, agree with ideas that are not aligned with school priorities, or hesitate to hold individuals accountable. While these behaviors may preserve short-term harmony, they can undermine long-term trust and effectiveness.
Respect grows when leaders demonstrate professional judgment, clarity of purpose, and reliability. Teachers and staff are more likely to trust leaders who communicate expectations clearly, apply standards consistently, and make decisions based on what best supports students. Over time, these behaviors build confidence in leadership capacity. Even when staff members disagree with a decision, they are more likely to maintain trust when they believe the leader is principled, thoughtful, and fair.
Importantly, the article does not suggest that likeability is unimportant. Positive relationships contribute to open communication, collaboration, and psychological safety. Educators are more willing to share concerns, experiment with new strategies, and seek support when they feel valued by leadership. The key insight is that likeability should grow naturally from respectful leadership practices rather than replace them.
For school leaders, the message is highly relevant. Education often involves complex decisions related to curriculum, staffing, student discipline, resource allocation, and school improvement initiatives. These decisions require balancing empathy with accountability. Leaders must demonstrate care for individuals while maintaining focus on institutional goals and student outcomes.
The article suggests that respected leaders consistently demonstrate several core behaviors:
• Making thoughtful, informed decisions
• Maintaining fairness and consistency in expectations
• Communicating honestly, even when conversations are uncomfortable
• Holding individuals accountable in constructive ways
• Protecting instructional priorities and school values
When leaders demonstrate these qualities, trust develops gradually but deeply. Staff members come to believe that decisions are guided by professional expertise rather than personal preference.
In schools, credibility is particularly important during periods of change. Implementation of new instructional programs, adoption of emerging technologies, and shifts in assessment practices often require educators to adapt their routines. Leaders who have earned respect are better positioned to guide teams through uncertainty because staff believe decisions are grounded in competence and integrity.
The article also underscores that respect and likability are not mutually exclusive. In fact, leaders who are respected for their competence often become well-liked because they create environments where people feel supported, guided, and successful. Warmth strengthens relationships, but competence sustains them.
For educational leaders, the takeaway is clear: strong leadership requires balancing empathy with decisiveness. Seeking approval alone may weaken leadership credibility, but combining clear expectations with genuine care builds cultures of trust and professional growth.
Ultimately, effective school leaders understand that respect is earned through consistent action. When leaders prioritize fairness, clarity, and thoughtful decision-making, positive relationships often follow naturally.
Leaders Who Confuse Being Liked With Being Respected. Admired Leadership (April 8, 2026).
Prepared with the assistance of AI software
OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (5.2) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.