When you raise the issue of why, and how, too much testing may be a problem—particularly if there is an argument about using such tests to measure teacher effectiveness- some people ask, “What’s the problem? Life is full of tests.”  However, some argue that the current regimen of tests is inappropriate in scope and emphasis relative to other aspects of the learning experience.  They may also argue that the one-size fits all approach to evaluating teachers of various subjects as measured in part by standardized test results in English and math is a poor indicator of effectiveness.


Let’s explore this last issue of evaluating art, music, math, science, and other teachers a bit more.  Let’s create an analogy to another profession—perhaps doctors.


All doctors will be judged and allowed to retain their license based on the following:


We will assess eye doctors, podiatrists, and pediatricians based on the results of data gleaned from a community’s ability to lose a specific amount of weight by a specific date on the calendar.  You happen to be a pediatrician who has just begun your practice, and as such you work in a relatively poor community.   Within the first few years of practice your license is revoked due to “poor performance.”  You never get to a point in your career where you might consider opening a practice in a more affluent community.  This, despite the fact that you are well respected, and have made significant inroads into improving the health and well being of community members in that less than wealthy neighborhood.


To further skew the validity of the measurement the fact remains that the weight loss data was conducted in a poor neighborhood, among community members who may not have attended college, and had less access resources that might bolster their chances of success.  Sure, some community members rose above their circumstances and met their weight loss goal, but they were the exception to the rule.  Thus, the eye doctors, podiatrists who also practiced in this community as well as the pediatricians who were held to this one size fits all standard suffered the personal and professional consequences of the poor performance of the patients within this area.


Think about someone in a profession who you respect getting caught up in a system of evaluation that inappropriately labels him or her as ineffective.  It could be a health care professional, a trusted accountant, or any other individual who you depend on to support you and your family in any aspect of your life.  Testing and measurement will always be a part of life and our livelihoods.  Effectively rendered, we can use this valuable information to guide and shape improvement, both personal and professional.  The present implementation of the system to test students and teachers is far from effective, and in fact is proving to be quite destructive.

Views: 634


You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!

Join School Leadership 2.0





School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe.  Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.


Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.


Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)





School Leadership 2.0

© 2021   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service