In irony worthy of Shakespeare, out-of-school suspensions have typically been used as punishment for students who are truant (absent from school without parental consent) or chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days). Given that the goal is to keep students in school and academically engaged, a few states have banned this practice. A recent JESPAR article examined the effects of this ban on absence rates in Arkansas, which established a law in 2013 banning out-of-school suspensions. The state offered no training to schools, and each was left to make its own way with the policy change. Although out-of-school suspensions were banned, other punishments were allowed to continue, including in-school suspension, which takes a student out of the regular classroom for a time but allows them to continue their work elsewhere.

Using data from all K-12 Arkansas public schools, researchers compared the attendance of truant and non-truant students between 2012-13 (pre-policy) and 2013-14 (post-policy) to see if there were any dramatic changes in attendance for truant students that did not occur with non-truant students. Subjects were limited to grades 7-12, in which 96% of truancy occurs.

Researchers found that compliance with the law was low, particularly in disadvantaged schools, with only 1/3 of all schools complying. Among schools that did comply, there was no evidence of change in student behavior after the policy went into effect. Three key findings were:

 In addition, researchers reflected that perhaps because there was still other punishment, truancy continued. They stated that punishment does not address the root causes as to why students are truant, and that student outcomes might not change if schools simply replace out-of-school suspensions with other types of punishment.