Education ideas should be tested on large numbers of students

What could be more obvious? New textbooks, new curricular, new reforms, whatever, can easily be tested and should be tested.

The bizarre thing is that there is so little large-scale testing in American education. Speaking as the house cynic, I would say that's because the Education Establishment knows their ideas are  Inferior and will perform poorly in serious testing.

This article also explores my impression that most of the so-called research in American education is really small sets of students doing small bits of a program. The goal is to build up a scaffolding of apparent proof. Typically, there is no such thing.

http://www.rantrave.com/Rant/Why-no-large-scale-testing-of-American...

John Saxon challenged all the powers that be in education to conduct serious experiments, his textbooks against Reform Math. Nobody would take him up. 

My sense is that we live in a largely illusionary world, where so-called education experts pretend that so-called  education methods actually work. 

Article: Why no large-scale testing of American education ideas?

Views: 68

Comment

You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!

Join School Leadership 2.0

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe.  Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

FOLLOW SL 2.0

© 2024   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service