Close Reading–- is it completely phony or just partly phony?

For millions of years--okay, several thousand--children were taught to read with nursery rhymes,  cute little stories, Jack  and the Beanstalk, and every other kind of sweet temptation you can dream up for young minds. You give them literary candy. You give them verbal toys. You pull them into the whole notion of reading, of liking books.

So right from the start I thought David Coleman was way off base. He wants children to read difficult stuff. He wants them to wallow  in difficult stuff. He wants them to struggle. Bah humbug.

Possibly, by the time they get to high school, after they have become good readers, you can give them increasingly difficult stuff. That's the process. But David Coleman and some of these Common Core extremists argue that you should start early, hit them over the head with some repair manuals, some tax regulations, some environmental manuals.  I have always hated to read such stuff, and I'm a literary guy. Imagine you've got your elementary school kids, who can hardly read at all, and you've got middle school kids who are still semi-literate, and you want to make them read a passage that is difficult for adults?? I say we need the guys with the big butterfly nets.

 Anyway, this article makes a strong case against Close Reading:

 Is Close Reading a complete fraud???

http://www.educationviews.org/close-reading-complete-fraud/

---------------------------------------

I want to add my big thought for 2015. Four words: the fix is in. Everywhere I look, everything I read, convinces me that the Education Establishment and people like David Coleman are leaving nothing to chance. In computers, they call this concept redundancy. So you don't teach a kid to read with phonics. So you make them spend hours trying to read something that nobody in his right mind would read by choice. So you make the boys read books intended for girls so they won't enjoy them. So you tell the local media: never explain reading, in that way, parents have no chance of helping their kids. And so on. Illiteracy is a done deal.

Views: 127

Comment

You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!

Join School Leadership 2.0

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2025   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service