A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Tim Shanahan
Blast from the Past: This blog first appeared on August 14, 2021, and was reissued with minor revisions on September 20, 2025. Reading education – like the lengths of skirts and the widths of neckties – tends to be trendy. That’s unfortunate for those kids who happen to be in school when phonics isn’t cool and learning styles are. I often reissue these entries when I sense renewed interest in a topic. This time it is just the opposite. I’m not hearing much interest in this lately, and I think this neglect is a serious problem for kids. Maybe this will help light a fire under some schools.
Disciplinary Literacy Goes to Elementary School
Teacher question: I’m an elementary school principal. I've heard a lot recently about disciplinary literacy. Our school isn't doing enough with that in my opinion. What do you think? What should I have my teachers doing with disciplinary literacy?
Shanahan responds:
Over the past three decades research has shown that people read differently in the different disciplines (Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008, 2012, 2020; Shanahan, Shanahan, & Misichia, 2011). Historians, for instance, read different kinds of texts, for different purposes, they weigh evidence differently, and focus on different kind of information in the texts that they read than do literary critics or scientists (Wineburg, Martin, Monte-Santo, 2011).
Reading starts out pretty generalizable. The skills we use to decode text are the same no matter what we read. The same can be said about the basics of comprehension. Informational texts in grade 2 are like each other in most respects, no matter from what field of study the information is drawn.
But as text gets more sophisticated things start to diverge. Content is not the only distinguishing feature of science, mathematics, history, and literature texts.
These differences appear to be linked to how knowledge is created in the different disciplines and the nature of the knowledge created. Historians devote what, in other disciplines, may seem to be inordinate amounts of time focused on the varied perspectives of participants in and observers of historical events. Scientists, on the other hand, don’t pay much attention to those kinds of differences, but focus on methodological rigor and replication.
As a result, most states have disciplinary literacy standards for grades 6-12. We want our kids to read at high levels and that means being able to read like historians, mathematicians, scientists, and literary critics.
Terrific.
But what about elementary school?
Should elementary school teachers teach disciplinary literacy?
Possibly a little, but, in the main, my answer is no. It doesn’t make sense to teach disciplinary literacy until kids are confronting the demands of truly disciplinary texts. This might start to happen in the upper elementary grades, which is why I say, “a little.” But most of the reading time in social studies, science, and math class should be more basic than that.
The main contribution that elementary teachers can make is to get kids ready to take on the rigors of disciplinary literacy in middle school and high school. Here are some of the things they can do to smooth the path to disciplinary literacy success:
READ MORE...
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.
Switch to the Mobile Optimized View
© 2025 Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany
Powered by
You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!
Join School Leadership 2.0