Principals' 
opposition to 
teacher evaluation 
grows

LoHud
Eighteen high school principals from 
northern Westchester and Putnam counties 
have joined the growing ranks of school 
administrators who are publicly opposing 
the state’s new teacher evaluation system.

The group said the new system, which will 
grade teachers in part on student test 
scores, is “problematic at best, damaging 
to our students and our profession at 
worst.”

A statement from the Northern 
Westchester/Putnam High School Principals 
Association said that the new system would 
pressure teachers to “teach to the test” and 
would focus attention on English and math 
— the subjects most tested — at the 
expense of social studies, science, the arts 
and physical education.

“Schools that were moving away from 
ubiquitous, test driven curricula in an effort 
to offer deeper, richer, more authentic 
curricula will now be forced back into a test 
driven curriculum,” it said.

Cheryl Champ, principal of Lakeland High 
School and leader of the group, said it’s 
going to be difficult to have the new 
system, the parameters of which are part 
 
of state law, amended. Gov. Andrew 
Cuomo has made teacher evaluations the 
centerpiece of his new education reform 
agenda.

“This approach is more politically driven 
than education driven,” she said. “We still 
hope certain things can be changed to 
make it more educationally sound.”

In an unusual public showing of solidarity 
and concern, hundreds of principals from 
across the state have signed statements 
opposing the high-profile new evaluation 
system, which will be used to grade 
growing numbers of teachers and 
principals in the next few years.

The movement started late last year with a 
public letter written by two Long Island 
principals that has been signed by 1,359 
principals across the state and more than 
4,400 other educators.

Since then, groups of principals from 
southern Westchester and Rockland 
counties have signed similar statements 
opposing the evaluation system.

The new statement from the northern 
Westchester/Putnam group questions the 
use of student test scores to grade t
eachers. “‘Student achievement’ carries 
with it a complex set of variables, which 
cannot be fully measured by quantitative 
analysis of standardized test scores,” it 
said.


The new system will grade teachers on a 
100-point scale and give them one of four 
overall ratings: highly effective (91-100); 
effective (75-90); developing (65-74); and 
ineffective (0-64).

It was adopted as state law in 2010 in 
order to strengthen New York’s application f
or the federal Race to the Top program. 
The state was subsequently awarded a 
$700 million federal grant.

Sixty percent of a teacher’s grade will be 
based primarily on classroom observations. 
Twenty percent will be based on how a 
teacher’s students progress on test scores. 
The final 20 percent will be based on a 
locally determined measure, which could 
be state or other tests.

Somers High School Principal Irene Perrella, 
who signed the statement and is retiring at 
the end of the year after four decades in 
education, said educators are put off by 
the growing numbers of mandates and 
regulations coming from Albany.

“Philosophically, the biggest question we 
have is how you reduce everything that 
 
goes on in the classroom to numbers,” she 
said. “It’s very unsettling. I’ve lived through 
a lot of change, but I’ve never seen so 
much change coming so quickly. It makes 
you question the validity and the purpose 
behind it all.”

Last week, Cuomo and leaders of New York 
State United Teachers announced an 
agreement on several sticking points. But it 
remains up to individual school districts to 
adopt the new evaluation requirements 
through collective bargaining with teacher 
and principal unions.

In fact, districts with contracts that were in 
effect before July 2010 do not have to put 
the system into effect until they negotiate 
new contracts. But the state is urging 
districts to move quickly, and Cuomo is 
threatening to withhold state aid from 
districts that do not have new evaluation 
rules in place by next January.

Views: 31

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe.  Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

FOLLOW SL 2.0

© 2024   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service