Why academe needs to stop comparing and ranking itself (opinion)

In business, success is measured in dollars. The person who makes the most sales or the CEO with the biggest salary is the top dog. In sports, success is often measured in personal statistics or championships.

In academe, we measure success via publications and awards. But it doesn’t stop there. We not only count publications in terms of their frequency, but we also weigh them according to a journal’s prestige. Each field has an informal list of what are considered the top journals, and, in addition, we use metrics such as the impact factor, or IF, to measure how many citations papers published in the journals receive. Every year, various outlets release new rankings, and scholars scramble to see how their favorite journals fare.

Read more...

VISIT WEBSITE

Views: 77

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe.  Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

FOLLOW SL 2.0

© 2024   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service