A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Which has a greater cognitive impact, handwriting or typing? - Recent research
Illustration by M. Keany/AI
In a groundbreaking study published on February 8, 2024, in the journal "Frontiers in Psychology," researchers from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology explored the cognitive impacts of handwriting versus typing on university students. This study, spearheaded by Audrey van der Meer, a neuropsychology professor at NTNU, and covered by Aria Bendix for NBC News Digital, sheds light on how these two methods of writing affect brain activity and, potentially, learning and memory.
The research involved 36 university students who were asked to either write words in cursive using a digital pen on a touchscreen or type the same words using a keyboard. The words were displayed on a screen, and participants had to reproduce them within a given timeframe. To monitor brain activity, the students wore caps fitted with 256 electrodes that recorded electrical signals from various regions of the brain, allowing the researchers to observe active areas and inter-brain communication.
The findings revealed a significant disparity in brain activation between handwriting and typing. Handwriting engaged almost the entire brain, necessitating a robust interplay between the visual, sensory, and motor cortices. This comprehensive activation is attributed to the process of visualizing and manually forming letters, each requiring distinct movement patterns. In contrast, typing induced minimal brain activation, primarily because the physical act of pressing keys requires less cognitive effort and less distinctive motor skills.
These results corroborate van der Meer's earlier research, which also indicated heightened brain activity during handwriting compared to typing in both children and young adults. Furthermore, a study from Indiana University in 2017 suggested that handwriting might enhance letter recognition in children by linking visual and motor skills.
Despite these insights, there is still ambiguity regarding the direct translation of increased brain activity during handwriting to tangible improvements in learning or memory retention. Moreover, the efficacy of note-taking on paper versus laptops in enhancing classroom learning and exam performance remains contested.
The study underscores the importance of incorporating both handwriting and typing into educational curricula, considering the digital age's demands. While typing offers efficiency for lengthy texts, handwriting could play a crucial role in cognitive development, especially during the brain's formative years.
As educational practices evolve, this research invites a reevaluation of traditional teaching methods, suggesting that a balanced approach to writing could foster optimal cognitive growth and learning outcomes.
Original article: Aria Bendix, "Writing by hand may increase brain connectivity more than typing, readings of student brains suggest," NBC News Digital, January 27, 2024.[URL here]
------------------------------
Prepared with the assistance of AI software
OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.