A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
When and how to deliver tutoring to maximize its impact
By Marta Pellegrini, University of Cagliari (Italy)
The American Educational Research Journal has published a meta-analysis on the impact of tutoring programs on student academic achievement in preK-12. The study aims to show how the effects vary based on a range of characteristics. For inclusion in the review, studies had to use randomized designs and evaluate preK-12 tutoring interventions on learning outcomes measured through independent tests (i.e., not created by researchers/developers of the program). A total of 90 studies were included in the review. Of these, 72 studies measured literacy outcomes and 22 math outcomes. Most of the programs were delivered by a paraprofessional (43 studies), while the others were delivered by teachers and non-professionals or parents. The authors also coded the following characteristics to assess the variation in impact of tutoring: teacher-student ratio, setting, grade level, and the quality of the study design.
Overall, results showed significant positive effects of tutoring programs on student achievement (ES = +0.29) with larger effect sizes in kindergarten (ES = +0.41) and grade 1 (ES = +0.38) than grades 2-11. One-to-one tutoring had a larger effect (ES = +0.32) than small group tutoring (ES = +0.26). Tutoring provided by teachers was found to be more effective (overall ES = +0.39) than tutoring provided by paraprofessionals (ES = +0.30) and non-professionals (ES = +0.17), with the strongest difference in first grade. On program delivery features, no difference was found between short and long duration (less or more than 20 weeks), while larger effects were found for intensity with 4-5 days/week of tutoring having a larger impact (ES = +0.35) than 1-3 days/week, however when tutoring was provided by a teacher, the effect for 3 days/week was higher. When tutoring was delivered in short sessions (less than 30 minutes; ES = +0.33) the impact was larger than when delivered in longer sessions (ES = +0.21). When tutoring was provided during the school time the effect was larger (ES = +0.31) than when provided after school (ES = +0.21).
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.