What motivates students to cheat?

By Winnie Tam, Centre for University and School Partnership, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Academic cheating is a serious worldwide problem that researchers believe can be affected by verbal “nudges.” Zhao and colleagues conducted a study to investigate the effects of messages about test difficulty on cheating behavior. They cited two possible motivations leading to increased cheating with respect to the difficulty messages.

•           Approach motivation: if students are informed that a test is difficult, cheating is a way to appear capable of academic success.

•           Avoidance motivation: if they are informed that a test is easy, they may be motivated to cheat to avoid appearing incompetent.

A sample of 201 children (94 girls) from 6 eighth grade (mean age = 13.4 years) classes at a middle school in Eastern China were asked to take a math test of equivalent difficulty, and perform self-scoring two weeks later. The 6 classes were randomly assigned to one of three differing conditions involving messaging about test difficulty. The differing information was given to them before they started the test.

•           Grade level condition: students were told that the test was of standard difficulty and that its difficulty was the same as their grade level.

•           Easy condition: students were told that the test was very easy and that its difficulty was below their grade level.

•           Hard condition: students were told that the test was very hard and that its difficulty was above grade level.

Unbeknownst to the students, the experimenters took photos of their test papers before they were returned to them for self-scoring. Researchers, therefore, could compare the self-reported scores and the actual scores. Two measures were taken: the first was for the presence of cheating, i.e., the self-reported score at least 1 point higher than the actual score; the second was to measure the cheating extent, which was computed by subtracting the actual score from the self-reported score.

•           This study found that the cheating rate was 40.9% in the grade-level condition, 62.1% in the easy condition, and 58.0% in the hard condition. The likelihood of cheating following messages about test difficulty was significantly higher than that following messages about grade level.

•           Among students who cheated, the cheating extent ranged from 1 to 61 points. Those in the easy condition inflated their scores significantly higher than their counterparts in the grade-level condition and the difficult condition. The grade-level condition and difficult condition had no difference.

If students decided to cheat, the cheating extent was more strongly affected by avoidance motivation than by approach. Researchers concluded that simple messaging can have a significant impact on children’s cheating behavior.

Views: 52

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2026   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service