A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Michael Keany
October, 2026
A principal walks into a classroom. The teacher hasn't begun the lesson yet.
Is there anything worth observing?
Absolutely.
Great principals know that teaching begins before the teacher begins talking. The physical environment, student behavior, materials, routines, relationships, and expectations already provide important evidence about the learning culture the teacher has created.
Charlotte Danielson's Framework for Teaching recognizes the classroom environment as a major component of effective teaching, including respect and rapport, a culture for learning, classroom procedures, student behavior, and the organization of physical space. These conditions aren't separate from instruction. They make instruction possible.
So what should a principal notice before the first instructional words are spoken?
Start with students—not the teacher.
Are students entering calmly and purposefully? Are they getting materials without repeated directions? Are they talking productively, preparing for class, or beginning an assigned task?
Or are they waiting for the teacher to create order?
Well-established routines reduce the amount of attention students must devote to figuring out what happens next. Research-based guidance emphasizes that clear routines create predictability and help students become ready to engage in learning.
A strong classroom often seems to start itself.
Look around.
Is student work visible? Are there books students can access? Are instructional resources within reach? Does the arrangement of desks support the kind of learning expected?
Most importantly, does the room appear designed primarily for adult convenience or student learning?
The Institute of Education Sciences recommends deliberately arranging classroom environments to support attention and engagement and reduce conditions contributing to disruptive behavior.
The question isn't whether the room is beautiful.
It's whether the room works.
Before the teacher speaks, can students determine what they will be learning?
Perhaps today's learning target, essential question, agenda, problem, image, quotation, or “Do Now” is visible.
A principal should distinguish between learning and activity.
“Complete questions 1–10” describes work.
“Determine how an author uses evidence to strengthen an argument” describes learning.
Moss and Brookhart's formative walkthrough approach specifically encourages observers to focus on what students are learning and doing rather than merely documenting teacher behavior.
Watch faces.
Do students appear comfortable approaching the teacher? Does the teacher greet students? Do students interact respectfully with one another? Is there evidence of warmth without chaos?
Some of the most revealing evidence may occur before formal instruction begins: a teacher quietly checking on a student who was absent yesterday, welcoming someone by name, noticing a new haircut, or asking about last night's game.
Those tiny interactions accumulate.
They tell students: You are known here.
Look for evidence of student agency.
Do students independently retrieve materials, submit work, check directions, move into groups, use classroom resources, and solve small problems?
Or must every action wait for teacher permission?
An effective classroom doesn't eliminate teacher authority. It uses routines to make students increasingly responsible for their own learning.
Finally, pause before judging.
Does the classroom feel anxious? Chaotic? Flat? Energetic? Purposeful? Welcoming?
Climate is difficult to reduce to a checklist, but it matters. Danielson's framework specifically identifies safe, respectful environments as conditions supporting student success.
Great principals therefore don't enter observations waiting for teachers to perform.
They observe before instruction officially begins.
They watch students. They notice routines. They examine the environment. They look for independence, relationships, purpose, and belonging.
Then the teacher begins talking.
By that point, the observant principal has already learned quite a lot.
Because some of the strongest evidence of great teaching can be found in what happens when the teacher doesn't have to say anything at all.
Danielson, Charlotte. “Observing Classroom Practice.” Educational Leadership, ASCD, 2012; and Danielson Group, Framework for Teaching.
Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. Reducing Behavior Problems in the Elementary School Classroom. U.S. Department of Education.
Moss, Connie M., & Susan M. Brookhart. Formative Classroom Walkthroughs: How Principals and Teachers Collaborate to Raise Student Achievement. ASCD.
------------------------------
Prepared with the assistance of AI software OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (5.2) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.