Using Discussion as a Summative Assessment

Verbal participation in discussions is a tried-and-true formative assessment, but it can also be rubric-based and summative.

January 23, 2024
Edutopia

Summary:

Rebecca Hall, an experienced educator, shares her positive experience with discussion assessments as an alternative to traditional tests. Over her two decades in education, especially the past two years of teaching online, Hall has explored various assessment methods and found discussion assessments to be more compassionate and effective in promoting critical thinking, collaboration, and content mastery.

Key Points:

  1. Compassionate Assessment: Hall introduces the concept of "compassionate assessment," emphasizing a supportive rather than punitive approach. Discussion assessments are seen as fostering critical thinking, encouraging peer-to-peer teaching, and providing students with opportunities to master content, creating a positive and engaging learning experience.

  2. Getting Started:

    • Hall suggests outlining meaningful questions before starting a unit. These questions should cover essential concepts and extension topics, with students having the freedom to explore additional areas based on their interests.
    • Questions are gradually introduced throughout the unit, tying back to the driving phenomena. This approach keeps students engaged and ready to synthesize their learning at the end of the unit.
  3. Implementation:

    • Students are given a full class period to choose questions and outline responses, often following a claim, evidence, and reasoning framework. Visuals are encouraged to support their responses.
    • Student choice is crucial, allowing them to select questions they understand best. Limiting preparation to three or four questions ensures depth in responses.
    • On the day of the discussion, students take the lead while the teacher moderates. A spreadsheet is used to document student contributions, promoting a supportive environment where no points are deducted for incorrect ideas.
    • A rubric is provided to assess the quantity and quality of student participation, ensuring fair evaluation.
  4. Documentation and Adaptation:

    • Students are required to take notes during discussions, holding them accountable for their learning. These notes also support a subsequent writing assessment, where students respond to a chosen discussion question in a paragraph.
    • For students who don't prepare, participate, or are absent, discussion questions can be turned into an alternative assessment, allowing all students to demonstrate deep content knowledge and critical thinking.
  5. Encouraging Teachers to Try New Approaches:

    • Hall encourages teachers to experiment with new approaches, particularly in challenging or less successful units. Additional resources, such as discussion sentence stems and a discussion rubric, are provided to inspire and guide educators in implementing discussion assessments.

Rebecca Hall's advocacy for discussion assessments aligns with the shift towards compassionate and student-centric assessment practices, offering a valuable alternative to traditional testing methods.

Read the orgininal

With AI Assist

Views: 78

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2025   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service