The Impact of Getting Comments on One’s Work – and a Score

From the Marshall Memo #490

In his new book, Embedded Formative Assessment (Solution Tree, 2011), British researcher Dylan Wiliam compares the impact of three ways of giving students feedback on math homework:

1. Giving students a score;

2. Giving students constructive feedback – specific comments on errors, suggestions on how to improve, and at least one positive remark;

3. Giving students constructive feedback and a score.

Students in the second group learned twice as fast as students in the first. But students in the third group (comments and a score) made no progress. Those with the highest scores felt no need to read the comments and those with the lowest scores didn't want to read the comments. The score was all they remembered.

[Could the same dynamic apply to teachers if the comments they get after administrators’ classroom visits are accompanied by rubric scores?  K.M.]

 

From The Main Idea’s summary of Embedded Formative Assessment by Dylan Wiliam (Solution Tree Press, 2011)

From the Marshall Memo #490

Views: 102

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2025   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service