A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
The Case for Renaming “Noncognitive Skills”
In this Education Week article, David Conley (University of Oregon) questions whether noncognitive is the right term for student attitudes, beliefs, and feelings as contrasted to cognitive learning (traditional content knowledge). “Are we not observing a higher form of thinking when we see students persist with difficult tasks, such as overcoming frustration,” asks Conley; “setting and achieving goals; seeking help; working with others; and developing, managing, and perceiving their sense of self-efficacy? Are these qualities not at least as important as knowing how well students recall information about the year in which the Civil War began, or how to factor a polynomial?” Noncognitive skills involve executive functioning by the brain as it adjusts to what’s going on around it and monitors learning.
Part of the problem has been the way mental attributes have been measured, he says. Cognitive skills are measured by standardized tests, noncognitive skills by attitude surveys. “Because experts judged noncognitive methods against inappropriate standards,” he says, “all noncognitive approaches came to be like the guy or girl who gets all dressed up for the party but never gets asked to dance.” Conley advocates for more rigorous measures that put noncognitive skills on a par with cognitive, so that we’re rigorously measuring not only what students learn but how they learn. Better information in the noncognitive domain would help students take more ownership of their own learning, he asserts. It would also provide a profile of our students – how they manage the learning process and how their beliefs about themselves as learners affect their ability to understand and retain content knowledge. This would do as much to improve learning and close the achievement gap as testing and understanding their content knowledge.
A better term for noncognitive skills, Conley believes, is metacognitive learning skills, and he’s committed to shifting his own language to this new term.
“What’s In a Name? Rethinking the Notion of ‘Noncognitive’” by David Conley in Education Week, Jan. 23, 2013 (Vol. 32, #18, p. 20-21),
From the Marshall Memo #471
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.