A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Posted by Ariel Sacks on Monday, 08/05/2013
CTE
Hello teachers of English! It's summer, and I imagine that, like me, you're considering various new and old book titles to bring to your students this year. There's a lot to consider with each choice, including a push from new Common Core assessments to increase the complexity of the texts we use. I want to share a tool I've just created for weighing the merits of a particular text, taking into account our specific groups of students and overall curriculum frameworks.
The tool is meant to help uncover the possible strengths and challenges for use of a particular text--not to quickly determine a yes or no answer. I imagine using this tool by myself or with members of my teaching team to help engage in discussion around the use of the text. I designed it for use with literary texts (fiction and nonfictional), but some of it could be applied to informational texts as well.
I created the visual tool using five domains for text selectionthat emerged when I wrote a chapter on book selection in my forthcoming book, Whole Novels for the Whole Class: A Student Centered Approach, (due out in October). A single book for a whole group creates a strong cultural experience for a classroom community, as well as myriad opportunities for academic growth. These five domains are the things I consider carefully as I make as I choose titles and consider where in the year they would be most useful.
For each domain, I've created a continuum. The idea is to assess the title along each continuum by drawing a dot and making any notes below. Though there are no hard and fast rules, in some domains, one side of the continuum is preferable to the other. For example, in Domain 1, Development, I'd say our texts should generally be developmentally meaningful to our stu... (though I can think of a few rare examples, in which I might depart from even this guideline). In Domain 2, Identification Level, however, both sides of the continuum are neutral. Depending on the time of year or the interests and readiness levels of my students, I may choose a book that is more of a "mirror" experience for my students, or more of a "window" into the unfamiliar. In this sense, the tool is really a chance to reflect and anticipate the opportunities and challenges around the meeting of your group of students and a text, at a particular time in the year.
This tool is brand new! Feedback welcome!
[Note: I am working on how to attach the file here. For now, emailwholenovels@gmail.com if you want a copy of the tool in Word]
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.