School Leadership 2.0
A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
School improvement meta-analysis - What works?
School improvement meta-analysis
By Justin Hill, Johns Hopkins University
|
In a recent meta-analysis, Beth E. Schueler and colleagues investigated the effects of school improvement initiatives spanning four major categories: turnaround, labeling, charter conversion, and closure. The search covered the years 2000-2019, effectively capturing the school improvement landscape from No Child Left Behind up until the COVID-19 pandemic school closures. Following a literature search and inclusion review, 67 studies were utilized in the analysis as the authors sought to determine the general effects of school improvement initiatives on student achievement along with specific effects associated with features of these initiatives.
A review of the effects on high-stakes achievement test scores showed that school improvement initiatives demonstrated a significant positive effect (ES = + 0.06) on math achievement and an insignificant effect on English achievement. A review of the effects on low-stakes achievement test scores showed a significant positive effect in both STEM (ES = +0.07) and the humanities (ES = +0.09). A review of non-test outcomes, such as attendance and graduation rates, did not reveal significant effects. Comparing across the different types of initiatives (i.e., turnaround, labeling, charter conversion, and closure) did not reveal significant differences in effectiveness. When comparing intervention features (e.g., extended learning time, school choice, tutoring), the only feature showing a significant association with increased effectiveness was teacher replacement (ES = +0.14 in both math and English). Extended learning time also demonstrated a positive association with increased effectiveness (ES = +0.08 in math and ES = +0.10 in English), but it was only significant at the .10 level. Principal replacement demonstrated a negative association with increased effectiveness (ES = -0.06 in math and ES = -0.06 in English), but this again was only significant at the .10 level.
This meta-analysis provides evidence of small, generally positive effects associated with school improvement initiatives over the past 20 years. These findings, particularly those that evaluate specific features of the initiatives, may help guide future efforts as schools continue attempts to improve student outcomes.
|
JOIN SL 2.0
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe. Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
FOLLOW SL 2.0
© 2024 Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany
Powered by
