A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
School improvement meta-analysis
By Justin Hill, Johns Hopkins University
|
In a recent meta-analysis, Beth E. Schueler and colleagues investigated the effects of school improvement initiatives spanning four major categories: turnaround, labeling, charter conversion, and closure. The search covered the years 2000-2019, effectively capturing the school improvement landscape from No Child Left Behind up until the COVID-19 pandemic school closures. Following a literature search and inclusion review, 67 studies were utilized in the analysis as the authors sought to determine the general effects of school improvement initiatives on student achievement along with specific effects associated with features of these initiatives.
A review of the effects on high-stakes achievement test scores showed that school improvement initiatives demonstrated a significant positive effect (ES = + 0.06) on math achievement and an insignificant effect on English achievement. A review of the effects on low-stakes achievement test scores showed a significant positive effect in both STEM (ES = +0.07) and the humanities (ES = +0.09). A review of non-test outcomes, such as attendance and graduation rates, did not reveal significant effects. Comparing across the different types of initiatives (i.e., turnaround, labeling, charter conversion, and closure) did not reveal significant differences in effectiveness. When comparing intervention features (e.g., extended learning time, school choice, tutoring), the only feature showing a significant association with increased effectiveness was teacher replacement (ES = +0.14 in both math and English). Extended learning time also demonstrated a positive association with increased effectiveness (ES = +0.08 in math and ES = +0.10 in English), but it was only significant at the .10 level. Principal replacement demonstrated a negative association with increased effectiveness (ES = -0.06 in math and ES = -0.06 in English), but this again was only significant at the .10 level.
This meta-analysis provides evidence of small, generally positive effects associated with school improvement initiatives over the past 20 years. These findings, particularly those that evaluate specific features of the initiatives, may help guide future efforts as schools continue attempts to improve student outcomes.
|
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.