A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Source: Suzanne Freedman, What We Get Wrong About Teaching Kids to Apologize and Forgive, Greater Good Magazine (April 2026)
In classrooms and homes, adults often prompt children to quickly say “I’m sorry” or “I forgive you” after a conflict. While well-intentioned, this common practice may actually undermine emotional development. Suzanne Freedman argues that forced apologies and forgiveness teach compliance—not empathy, accountability, or healing.
True apology and forgiveness are not scripted behaviors; they are complex emotional and moral processes that require time, reflection, and choice. When educators rush these moments, they unintentionally teach students to suppress feelings rather than understand them.
When students are required to apologize immediately, they often do so without genuine understanding. The result is a ritualized response—words without meaning.
Rather than learning responsibility, students learn:
This weakens the development of authentic accountability.
Similarly, asking a child to forgive before they are ready can invalidate their feelings. Children may still feel hurt, angry, or confused—but are taught to ignore those emotions.
Research suggests this leads to emotional suppression, not resilience.
Apology and forgiveness are powerful tools for building:
But these skills only develop when children are allowed to process what happened, not bypass it.
Freedman emphasizes that both apology and forgiveness must be voluntary and meaningful.
Critically, forgiveness is not required and does not mean excusing behavior or reconciling with someone who caused harm.
Instead of forcing quick resolutions, educators can guide students through a developmental process:
When conflict occurs, begin with acknowledgment:
Validation communicates that emotions are legitimate and manageable.
Give students time to reflect before expecting apologies or forgiveness. Emotional understanding cannot be rushed.
Help students name and understand feelings:
This builds the foundation for empathy and self-awareness.
Students should learn that:
When children feel ownership, their responses become authentic and meaningful.
Encourage restorative actions:
These actions deepen learning far more than scripted apologies.
In many classrooms, conflict resolution is treated as a quick behavioral fix. But Freedman’s work highlights a critical shift:
➡️ From compliance → to character development ➡️ From speed → to emotional depth
➡️ From control → to student agency
This aligns closely with restorative practices, which prioritize healing, accountability, and relationship-building over punishment or superficial resolution.
For school leaders, the message is clear: If we want students to develop empathy, resilience, and integrity, we must rethink how we handle everyday conflicts.
When students apologize in your school, are they ending a problem—or beginning to understand it?
Source: Suzanne Freedman, What We Get Wrong About Teaching Kids to Apologize and Forgive, Greater Good Magazine (April 2026)
------------------------------
Prepared with the assistance of AI software
OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (5.2) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.