A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe

The CAP report is the third in recent months to provide a closer look at the day-in, day-out work of students and teachers. In September, “The Opportunity Myth” from nonprofit The New Teacher Project showed that less than one-fifth of the assignments students complete meet college readiness standards, and that low-income students, English language learners, students of color and those with disabilities are far less likely than students not in those groups to be assigned grade-level work.
Also last fall, education consultant and former school and district administrator Joe Feldman released an analysis of teachers’ grading practices, suggesting that assignments are subjectively graded, biased against less-affluent and generally lower-performing students, and may overlook a student’s recent progress.
Homework — and probably how it’s graded — however, could be “a valuable opportunity to support student achievement," the CAP report says. “The authors believe that access to grade-level content at home will increase the positive impact of adopting more rigorous content standards."
Grading and assignments — whether in class or at home — are areas that can be difficult to change, however, because they are practices over which teachers tend to think they should have some flexibility and be able to use their professional judgment. Personalized learning programs can allow teachers to customize assignments to students varying abilities, the authors write. But some districts in recent years have been rejecting the idea of homework or emphasizing reading over routine assignments. While eliminating homework may not benefit students that could use some extra practice, it’s clear that what and how much is assigned will continue to be a subject of debate.
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.