A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Dana Goldstein’s article, “Reading Skills of 12th Graders Hit a New Low” (The New York Times, September 9, 2025), reports alarming findings from the latest National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The results show that the reading skills of high school seniors are at their weakest since 1992, while math scores have fallen to their lowest since 2005. These outcomes have profound implications for students’ futures, schools’ responsibilities, and the broader economy.
The data reveal that one-third of seniors lack basic reading skills, meaning they struggle with essential tasks such as paraphrasing a political speech or interpreting a character’s motives in a story. Nearly half scored below the basic level in math, leaving them unable to apply percentages or other fundamental skills in real-world contexts. Only about one-third of seniors are graduating with the literacy and numeracy skills needed for college-level work.
The declines reflect long-standing struggles but are compounded by recent crises. Seniors in this dataset were eighth graders when the pandemic closed schools in March 2020, forcing millions into remote learning during critical developmental years. The pandemic magnified pre-existing inequities, and NAEP results underscore how vulnerable students have been hit hardest.
Importantly, Goldstein emphasizes that achievement declines began well before COVID-19. For over a decade, scores for low-performing students have dropped significantly, while higher-achieving students (90th percentile and above) have maintained stable performance. This widening gap suggests that the “floor” of academic achievement has collapsed, raising concerns about equity and opportunity.
At the same time, the cultural shift toward screen time, social media, and video content has displaced reading. Both adults and children are spending less time with print materials, reducing opportunities to develop deep reading comprehension. Compounding the problem, federal and state accountability systems designed to hold schools responsible for academic progress have weakened over the past decade, further diminishing focus on raising test scores.
Educational policy priorities have shifted sharply. Among Republicans, energy has centered on private-school vouchers and parental choice, rather than test-based accountability. Many Democrats, meanwhile, have prioritized student well-being, mental health, and social supports, sometimes at the expense of academic rigor. These shifts, Goldstein notes, have not produced national gains in achievement.
The article also details turmoil at the federal level. The National Center for Education Statistics—the agency administering NAEP—has been gutted, with staffing reduced from around 100 to just three employees under the Trump administration’s efforts to dismantle the Department of Education. This hollowing out has raised concerns about the government’s ability to track and respond to the crisis.
Experts describe the situation as both an educational and economic emergency. Margaret Spellings, former U.S. Education Secretary, warns that declining literacy and math skills threaten America’s workforce readiness and global competitiveness. Employers will face challenges finding skilled workers, while graduates lacking foundational competencies may struggle in an AI-driven job market.
Some education advocates, such as Marc Porter Magee of 50CAN, argue that solutions already exist. States like Louisiana and Tennessee have shown progress through high-dosage tutoring, rigorous curricula, and transparent communication with parents. The barrier, he contends, is not a lack of knowledge but a lack of political will to scale effective strategies nationally.
Others, like historian D. Graham Burnett, suggest that as technology reshapes communication, society may need to rethink how literacy is defined and practiced. While reading remains essential, traditions of knowledge transmission may evolve into formats beyond print, from oral performance to digital media. Still, Burnett insists, “It’s important that we not throw out reading.”
For educators, the NAEP results are both a warning and a call to action. Schools must intensify early literacy instruction, expand tutoring, and ensure access to high-quality curricula. Just as crucial, teachers and administrators must advocate for sustained attention to academics, even as schools address mental health and equity. The crisis is not just about test scores—it’s about preparing students for citizenship, college, and careers in a rapidly changing world.
Dana Goldstein, “Reading Skills of 12th Graders Hit a New Low,” The New York Times, September 9, 2025. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/09/us/12th-grade-reading-skills-low...
Prepared with the assistance of AI software
OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.