Online vs. in-person makeup courses
 

Traditionally, students who fail high school courses are able to retake them in summer school or during the school year in a classroom setting. Now that online courses are available, students are increasingly choosing this route instead of face-to-face instruction to retake their failed subjects. However, there is little evidence supporting the effectiveness of these online courses. In an effort to provide information for districts considering online credit recovery, the American Institutes for Research (AIR) has released a research brief comparing the effects of an online Algebra I makeup course to the one typically offered face-to-face.

The sample included 1,224 ninth graders who had failed Algebra I in 17 Chicago Public Schools that offered both online and in-person makeup courses. Students were randomly assigned to receive either the online or in-person course in the summers of 2011 and 2012, with each course lasting three weeks and consisting of 60 instructional hours. Most students (86%) were low SES; 62% were male and 38% were female; and 57% were Hispanic, 33% African American, and 8% White. Students in both conditions had the same prior achievement levels and class sizes.

Results favored in-person instruction over online instruction. Students who took Algebra I online rated the course as more difficult than did students in the in-person course, had more negative attitudes about math than the in-person students, and achieved lower scores and credit-recovery rates than the in-person students. It is of note, however, that there were no significant differences between the two groups in subsequent math course performance or in being on track for graduation at the end of the second year of high school.
The authors recognize that in some schools, online courses are the only viable way to recover credit and suggest that online courses might be more helpful to high-risk students by providing a review of the earlier content that students need to succeed in Algebra I.

This research brief is one of three in AIR's "Back on Track" study, all of which can be accessed through http://www.air.org/project/back-track-study-using-online-courses-credit-recovery.

Views: 58

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2026   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service