A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Teacher Preparation
More than half of America's newest teachers believe that an infusion of technology in their classrooms could help them be more efficient according to a new surevey. They also tend to be "comfortable" with major areas of teaching responsibilities — understanding instructional goals, lesson planning and classroom management. But they also possess "concerns" about preparation in other areas. They're less confident than more experienced teachers, for example, in preparation of instructional goals and standards (58 percent vs. 12 percent), project based learning (38 percent vs. 31 percent), differentiated learning (36 percent vs. 22 percent) and developing assessments (35 percent vs. 20 percent).
Those results surfaced in a survey of 2,886 new and more experienced teachers done last fall by Simba Information and MCH Strategic Data. The results have been published in a new Simba report, "New Teachers, Getting Adjusted, 2015-2016." The report covers the experiences of K-12 teachers and their views on the use of technology and other forms of instructional materials, their motivations for getting into education and how they prepare for the classroom. Among the respondents, 21 percent were new to teaching in the current school year; 12 percent are in their second year of teaching; 27 percent have at least two years of experience but are new to their current position, school or district; and 40 percent are in at least their third year of teaching and not new to their current position or school.
The survey asked teachers to express their levels of comfort and concern about their preparation in a number of areas. The areas of greatest preparation comfort were content related — subject knowledge and lesson planning; the least was differentiated instruction and project based learning.
"While the comfort level among teachers across the board is quite high for each of the topics, the areas of concern shared by teachers across the board and new teachers are project-based learning and differentiated instruction. For all respondents, interpretation of test data nudges out assessment development as a third area," said Kathy Mickey, managing editor of Simba's Education Group.
She added that new teachers "also showed a surprising penchant for the use of traditional print instructional materials in core subjects (topping 40 percent), but almost a fifth of new teachers found free Web-based resources they pull together themselves particularly popular for science and social studies."
The 70-page report is on Simba's Web site.
About the Author
Dian Schaffhauser is a writer who covers technology and business for a number of publications. Contact her at dian@dischaffhauser.com.
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.