Longer school days, school years: Somewhat helpful to boosting student learning, but amped-up teaching does more, study finds

Longer school days, school years: Somewhat helpful to boosting student learning, but amped-up teaching does more, study finds

www.oregonlive.com/education/2015/01/longer_school_days_or_school_y..." width="2" height="2"/>

The Obama administration required low-performing schools that got federal money intended to spur a turnaround to add time to their school day or school year. Years into the effort, however, school leaders who accepted federal millions say the added teaching time was only moderately helpful.

Stepped up teaching, often resulting from teachers being given more time to collaborate, yields a much bigger payoff, they report.

That is a primary conclusion of a new study of 17 schools in four states, including three in Oregon, released Monday by the Washington, D.C.,-based Center on Education Policy: "Expanded Learning Time: A Summary of Findings from Case Studies in Four States."

The experience of Portland's Madison HighWoodburn's Washington Elementary and the Eugene-area alternative school Kalapuya High all are covered in depth in the study. Schools and districts in the study are given fictitious names, but The Oregonian/OregonLive was easily able to deduce their identities.

To satisfy requirements of its federal School Improvement Grant, Washington Elementary added 30 minutes to every school day, paying teachers extra to work a longer day than all other teachers in Woodburn. It also offers three weeks of summer school to students who most need it.

Madison High, in Northeast Portland, offers after-school academics and enrichment via the county-funded SUN School program, which is a much cheaper approach than paying certified teachers to work hours more per day. Madison also holds school on eight Saturdays per year, with attendance mandatory for students who need to raise their grades or demonstrate mastery of reading, writing or math to qualify for a diploma.

Principals at both schools said they don't foresee a way to afford longer school days or school years after the federal grants run out. But they also say teacher training, teacher collaboration and improved instructional techniques – not more time in class – have had the biggest payoff for student achievement and will be most essential to continue. 

"Any effort to expand learning time should go hand in hand with a plan for improving the quality of instruction," said Maria Ferguson, executive director of the center that conducted the study.

At Washington Elementary, teachers developed and learned to use more accurate tools to measure what each student knows and doesn't know, so instruction can be pitched to the level that students need, Principal Juan Larios told researchers conducting the study. By putting all hands on deck at certain times during the school day, including teachers, instructional coaches, reading specialists and educational assistants, the school can break students into small classes and small groups to better address their specific needs, he said.

Deploying highly sensitive assessments to detect levels of student learning, and matching the correct intervention to students who are behind, has ramped up the speed and effectiveness of student learning, Larios said.

Madison High's successes in driving up student achievement, particularly in math, have been documented in The Oregonian/OregonLive. Madison Principal Petra Callin (referred to in the study by the pseudonym Pamela Clarkson) told the researchers that adding Saturdays to the school year proved less important than making better use of teaching time the school already had. Key to that, Callin said, has been to help teachers work together to scrupulously examine what students need to learn and what techniques work best to teach them those things.

The study quotes Callin at length on that point:

"When people are looking at improvement for schools, I don't think that (lengthening the school day or school year) is the central strategy. I think it is a peripheral strategy. I would never say that giving kids more time is a bad thing, ever. It's a great thing. ...I believe other strategies ... are more important. ... I think the two things that make the most sense to really focus on are the instruction that happens in the classroom during the school day -- the quality of that instruction -- as well as safety nets for when kids are falling through the cracks. "

The Oregon Board of Education is weighing whether and how to enforce state rules requiring students ....

Prompted by Oregon schools chief Rob Saxton, the panel is considering a plan to require some elementary schools to offer more teaching time. And it is looking at withholding some money from high schools that don't deliver a full teaching day to some students. Currently the state pays high schools the same amount of money, about $6,500, for a student who takes five courses and has three free periods in an eight-period schedule as for a student who takes eight courses.

betsyhammond@oregonian.com

503-294-7623; @chalkup

Views: 71

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2026   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service