Long Island Segregation Drives Educational Inequality 60 Years After Brown v BOE by Jaime Franchi

Views: 183

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

              It is simply a flat contradiction between the Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. the Board of Education which stated that de jure segregation policies were illegal and the fact of school zoning which is clearly de jure, and should be declared illegal, again!  Regardless of housing which is used as the reason for the segregation, if there were no school zones and students could attend any school they chose and schools had fair admission procedures, the segregation between schools would vanish. But, Carol Burris raises a key issue: segregation within schools and within classrooms.

There is a false belief that there is something teachers do like become extremely well-informed in their subject matter, or sequence instruction, or lead discussion, or charismatically engage all of the students that leads to high test scores and college admissions, but you can only have a discussion if the students have read the text. The students have to be willing to have a discussion, to abide by rules of social order, to make an effort to cooperate, and to show basic respect towards their teachers and peers. On the one hand, we have an ideology that claims that the teacher is the most important element in the educational process, and on the other, we have belief systems that reject the reading process. The example in the text above about the extras that schools provide were all related to special effects at sports games. Sports takes over the minds of students and instead of developing ideas and plans, they are practicing and worrying over winning at the games. What about literacy? What about the reading? What about developing arguments and solving real problems. 

The connection between school districts and housing prices and tax rates should be solved by across the board elimination of school zones and a flat property tax. School budgets can be supplemented by the income tax. Students should be able to address all other peers regardless of race, class, gender or talent in their school contexts, just like college, just like work, just like everyday interactions.  If a student studies and the school environment is safe (and this is a huge assumption given the lack of moral values by many individuals regardless of their age or role), then the racial, class or gender composition should not make a difference.  

Racial segregation is very common and it occurs because of de jure policies that stipulate that students may only attend certain schools on the basis of their home address. This is precisely the state of affairs that was rejected by the Supreme Court in 1954.

RSS

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe.  Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

FOLLOW SL 2.0

© 2024   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service