A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Is the decline in adult literacy related to student reading scores? Part 2
by Michael Keany
Short answer: yes, declining adult literacy and reduced family reading practices are plausibly contributing factors to lower student reading scores—but the relationship is indirect, cumulative, and mediated by home literacy environments, not a simple one-to-one causal chain.
Let’s break this into two parts.
Conceptually, yes—and the mechanism is well-established in research.
Adult literacy matters not only for employment or civic life, but because it shapes what researchers call the home literacy environment: how often adults read, how confidently they read aloud, how they talk about text, and whether reading is modeled as a valued activity.
Decades of research show that:
Children whose parents read frequently and comfortably are exposed to richer vocabulary, syntax, and background knowledge before formal schooling.
Parents with lower literacy skills are less likely to read aloud, ask comprehension questions, or engage in extended language-rich conversations around books.
These differences emerge before kindergarten and compound over time.
When adult literacy stagnates or declines at scale—as recent U.S. assessments indicate—the average literacy environment children encounter at home likely weakens, especially in communities already facing economic stress.
This does not mean parents are uncaring or disengaged. It means:
Reading may feel harder, more effortful, or less rewarding.
Adults may rely more on screens, video, or oral communication than print.
Schools increasingly shoulder the full burden of literacy development.
So while today’s adults are not the same people as today’s fourth graders, adult literacy levels shape the ecosystem in which children grow up. That makes adult literacy a background condition, not a proximal cause—but still influential.
Yes. Multiple national surveys show clear declines in family reading frequency, particularly since the early 2010s and accelerating after the pandemic.
Scholastic Kids & Family Reading Report
The share of parents reading aloud to children ages 0–5 declined steadily from 2012 to 2022.
Parents citing “lack of time” and “child prefers screens” increased sharply.
Fewer children report being read to “almost every day,” especially in middle- and lower-income households.
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Pediatric literacy initiatives report reduced shared reading time, particularly after COVID disruptions.
Families report more difficulty sustaining routines like bedtime reading.
Common Sense Media
Family media-use studies show sharp increases in screen time for both adults and children, often displacing shared reading.
Adults themselves report reading fewer books for pleasure—a strong predictor of whether children are read to.
NCES Early Childhood Longitudinal Studies
Parents’ reported frequency of reading to young children has flattened or declined, with widening gaps by income and parental education.
Taken together, the data point to less shared reading, not more, across the last decade.
There is no single dataset that directly links:
declining adult literacy → reduced parent reading → lower NAEP scores
…but the chain of evidence across studies is consistent:
Adult literacy in the U.S. has declined since 2017.
Adults report reading less themselves.
Parents report reading less to children.
Children enter school with a weaker vocabulary and background knowledge.
NAEP reading scores decline—especially at the basic and below-basic levels.
This is a systems-level explanation, not an individual one. Schools alone cannot fully compensate for weakened literacy environments outside school.
If we treat NAEP declines as purely instructional failures, we miss half the picture. The data suggest we also need:
Family literacy initiatives, not just student interventions
Adult reading support through libraries, community colleges, and workforce programs
Simple, low-barrier parent guidance on reading aloud—even for parents who struggle with reading themselves
In short: Student literacy does not exceed the literacy ecosystem that surrounds it.
Addressing student reading outcomes without attending to adult literacy and family reading habits is likely to produce only limited gains, no matter how strong the curriculum.
Original Article------------------------------
Prepared with the assistance of AI software
OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.