A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
I Used to Teach Students. Now I Catch ChatGPT Cheats
I once believed university was a shared intellectual pursuit. That faith has been obliterated
by Troy Jollimore
The Walrus
Updated Mar. 5, 2025
In his article, "I Used to Teach Students. Now I Catch ChatGPT Cheats," Troy Jollimore, a philosophy professor at a Californian university, reflects on the profound impact of artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT on academic integrity and the educational experience. He draws an analogy between AI and the "Magic Bag" from folklore—a device that grants any wish instantly—to illustrate the ease with which students can now generate essays without genuine engagement or learning.
The Rise of AI in Academia
Jollimore observes that AI tools have become adept at producing essays on topics ranging from Plato's Republic to the ethics of organ trade. These AI-generated papers often exhibit a neutral and methodical tone, systematically presenting frameworks and balancing considerations to reach conclusions. Some even include fabricated quotations with non-existent page numbers. Despite explicit prohibitions against AI use in syllabi and repeated reminders, many students continue to submit AI-generated work, undermining the educational process.
Challenges in Detecting AI-Generated Work
Identifying AI-generated essays poses significant challenges. While less sophisticated AI outputs are detectable due to their bland and uniform style, more advanced versions can closely mimic human writing, making detection increasingly difficult. This situation has led educators to spend more time policing assignments than engaging in meaningful teaching.
Erosion of Educational Values
The widespread use of AI for assignments reflects a deeper issue: the erosion of the perceived value of education. Jollimore notes that many students view education merely as a means to secure employment, rather than as a transformative intellectual journey. This perspective is exacerbated by societal anti-intellectualism, where practical intelligence is often valued over scholarly pursuits. Consequently, some students aim to complete their education unchanged, using AI to avoid the challenges that foster growth and critical thinking.
Implications for Teaching Practices
The infiltration of AI into academia has forced educators to reconsider their teaching methodologies. Some have shifted to in-class, handwritten assignments to ensure authenticity, while others have adapted their curricula to integrate AI responsibly. However, these measures come with their own set of challenges, including concerns about fairness and the effectiveness of such assessments in truly measuring student understanding.
The Ethical Dimension
For courses like health ethics, where students are preparing for professions that involve critical decision-making, the reliance on AI-generated work is particularly concerning. Without genuine engagement with ethical dilemmas during their education, future professionals may be ill-equipped to handle real-world situations that require nuanced judgment and empathy. This gap in preparation could have serious consequences, not only for the individuals themselves but also for those they serve in their professional capacities.
A Call to Reaffirm Educational Integrity
Jollimore's reflections serve as a call to action for educators to reaffirm the value of authentic learning. While AI can be a useful tool, its misuse undermines the educational mission of developing critical thinkers and informed citizens. Educators are encouraged to adapt their teaching strategies to emphasize the process of learning over the mere production of assignments, fostering an environment where students value the journey of education as much as its outcomes.
In conclusion, the advent of AI tools like ChatGPT presents both challenges and opportunities for education. By addressing the ethical implications and adapting teaching methodologies, educators can guide students toward a more meaningful and authentic educational experience.
------------------------------
Prepared with the assistance of AI software
OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.