A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Title: I Let Students Choose Their Grading Criteria, and Here’s How It Went
Author: Amy Szczepanski
Published: February 2, 2024
Source: [Original Article]
Summary:
Amy Szczepanski, a science teacher, shares her experience of allowing students to choose their final project topics and grading criteria, resulting in increased engagement and personalized learning experiences.
Implementation Process:
Student Autonomy: Students were given the freedom to select their final project topics related to biology or chemistry, along with the format to demonstrate their knowledge.
Collaborative Rubric Development: Szczepanski collaborated with students to develop personalized grading rubrics based on their chosen projects and individual abilities. Students had the opportunity to propose modifications and adjustments to the rubrics.
Diverse Project Outcomes: The final projects showcased a wide range of creativity and ingenuity, from Minecraft models of DNA to presentations on the chemistry of photography, tailored to students' interests and strengths.
Accountability and Evaluation: Students were accountable for meeting the criteria outlined in their personalized rubrics. By involving students in the grading process, Szczepanski fostered trust and connection, shifting the focus from compliance to genuine learning outcomes.
Benefits:
Increased Engagement: Allowing students to choose their topics and grading criteria resulted in heightened enthusiasm and commitment to learning, with students investing more effort into projects aligned with their interests.
Personalized Learning: The approach facilitated individualized learning experiences, catering to students' diverse learning styles and preferences.
Empowerment and Ownership: Students felt empowered to advocate for themselves and negotiate grading criteria, fostering a sense of ownership over their learning journey.
Teacher-Student Connection: Szczepanski noted a stronger sense of connection and trust between herself and her students, as the grading process became a collaborative endeavor.
Conclusion:
Szczepanski concludes that by relinquishing control over grading criteria and empowering students to take ownership of their learning, educators can unlock students' potential and foster a deeper connection to the learning process. The approach not only enhances student engagement but also nurtures a sense of accountability and mutual respect within the classroom.
--------
This summary was created with the assistance of AI software.
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.