A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
by Michael Keany
October 2026
The best teachers enter the classroom with a plan—but they are rarely prisoners of it.
A strong lesson plan establishes the destination: what students should know, understand, or be able to do by the end of the lesson. Yet great teaching requires continually adjusting the route based on what students are actually learning. The teacher is simultaneously teaching the lesson and gathering evidence about whether the lesson is working.
This is sometimes called responsive or adaptive teaching. The Education Endowment Foundation describes effective adaptive teaching as a process of checking what students understand and using that information to decide what should happen next.
A quiet classroom does not necessarily mean students understand. Neither does completing an assignment.
Great teachers constantly search for evidence of thinking. They listen to student explanations, examine written responses, watch students attempt problems, pose questions, use mini-whiteboards, conduct quick polls, and ask students to summarize what they have learned.
These small formative assessments provide what might be called the classroom's instructional dashboard.
The crucial question becomes:
“Based on what I am seeing right now, what should I do next?”
Research on formative assessment has long demonstrated that assessment has its greatest value when teachers actually use the information to modify instruction.
One mark of an experienced teacher is the willingness to stop a lesson that is not working.
Suppose a teacher discovers that one-third of the class has misunderstood an essential concept. Continuing simply because the next activity appears on the lesson plan makes little sense.
Instead, the teacher might say, “I'm seeing something that tells me we need to spend another few minutes here.”
The teacher may provide another example, model the thinking differently, use a visual representation, ask students to explain their reasoning, or briefly reteach a prerequisite skill.
The EEF offers a useful decision framework: when many students misunderstand, pause and fix; when some are unsure, adjust support; when most understand, extend the learning.
Weak adjustment often sounds like this:
“I explained it once, so I'll explain it again—only louder and slower.”
Great teachers recognize that if the first explanation did not produce understanding, students may need a different representation of the idea.
A teacher might move from words to a diagram, from abstract explanation to concrete example, from teacher explanation to student demonstration, or from whole-class instruction to a brief partner discussion.
The goal remains constant. The pathway changes.
Great teachers also recognize when students are ready to move faster.
If nearly everyone demonstrates mastery five minutes into an activity planned for fifteen minutes, there is little educational value in requiring students to complete ten more nearly identical examples.
Instead, the teacher may introduce a more challenging problem, ask students to apply the idea in an unfamiliar situation, compare competing solutions, or explain why an answer works.
Likewise, when students need additional processing time, great teachers resist the temptation to rush simply because the clock says the lesson should move forward.
Perhaps the most important distinction is between changing the support and changing the standard.
A struggling student might receive a worked example, vocabulary support, additional questioning, a graphic organizer, a manipulable, or another opportunity to practice.
Meanwhile, a student who demonstrates early mastery might encounter a more complex application.
The learning objective remains intact while the teacher varies the assistance students receive.
Ironically, the teachers who adjust lessons most effectively are often excellent planners.
Their lesson plans contain possible misconceptions, strategic questions, checkpoints for understanding, alternative explanations, extension activities, and places where they can slow down or accelerate.
They do not merely plan what they will teach.
They plan how they will know whether students learned it—and what they will do if they didn't.
That may be the defining difference between delivering a lesson and teaching one.
A lesson plan is written before students enter the room.
Great teaching begins when students respond to it.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Education Endowment Foundation. (2026). Adaptive Teaching in Practice: Using Feedback to Check Understanding.
Wiliam, D., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2024). “Collecting Evidence of Learning.” Educational Leadership. ASCD.
------------------------------
Prepared with the assistance of AI software OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (5.2) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations. Click here to explore and contribute an article.
Also, consider the exciting learning opportunity offered through the Mentors.net AI Academy.