A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
How Do Great Administrators Work with Their Secretaries?
by Michael Keany
August 2026
In many schools, the secretary is the first person families call, the colleague teachers consult, and the professional who recognizes trouble before it reaches the administrator’s door. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics notes that school secretaries often manage much of the communication among parents, students, community members, teachers, and administrators. Great administrators understand the implication: The secretary is not merely a keeper of calendars and forms, but a central partner in the school’s daily functioning.
Strong partnerships begin with an explicit conversation about responsibilities, authority, and priorities. Which decisions may the secretary make independently? What requires consultation? Which interruptions should reach the administrator immediately? What information is confidential? Without this clarity, leaders create either bottlenecks or risky improvisation.
A brief daily huddle can prevent both. Five or ten minutes each morning allows the administrator and secretary to review absences, visitors, deadlines, family concerns, staffing gaps, sensitive student matters, and changes to the day. The goal is not to control every task. It is to build a shared picture of what matters most.
They should agree on communication rhythms: what belongs in email, what deserves a quick conversation, and what must be documented. Predictable channels reduce duplication, prevent missed commitments, and keep the secretary from having to reconstruct decisions from messages and hallway exchanges.
Poor delegation sounds like, “Send this” or “Schedule that.” Effective delegation explains the purpose, audience, deadline, constraints, and desired result. Context allows an experienced secretary to anticipate problems, improve communication, and exercise sound judgment.
This matters because effective principals influence schools through organizational management, people development, productive climate, and instructional focus, according to Grissom, Egalite, and Lindsay’s synthesis of 219 studies. A secretary who understands the leader’s priorities can help protect time for classroom visits, coaching, family engagement, and urgent student needs.
Administrators should never ask secretaries to conceal mistakes, carry inappropriate messages, or absorb anger that belongs with the leader. They should support their secretary publicly, address concerns privately, and apply agreed-upon procedures consistently. Bryk and Schneider’s research identifies respect, competence, personal regard, and integrity as foundations of relational trust in schools. Those qualities are built through ordinary interactions: keeping promises, sharing credit, listening carefully, and correcting errors without humiliation.
Communication must travel both ways. Great administrators invite candid information, including news they may not want to hear. Secretaries often see patterns leaders miss: repeated parent confusion, a student visiting the office every morning, staff frustration with a procedure, or a calendar that makes priorities impossible. Leaders should treat these observations as valuable operational evidence while independently verifying sensitive concerns.
Because secretaries handle private records, family circumstances, personnel issues, and emergencies, administrators must provide clear confidentiality protocols, appropriate technology access, and relevant training. They should also respect workload and working hours. Constantly labeling routine matters “urgent” erodes judgment and increases errors.
Great administrators invest in their secretaries’ growth through training, cross-functional experience, feedback, and participation in appropriate planning meetings. They also create backup systems so one person does not become the sole holder of essential knowledge.
Finally, effective leaders express specific appreciation. “Thank you for reorganizing today’s coverage so teachers could remain with students” carries more meaning than generic praise. It connects the work to the school’s mission.
The best administrator-secretary relationships are neither hierarchical performances nor informal friendships without boundaries. They are disciplined professional partnerships built on clarity, trust, judgment, respect, and shared purpose. When that partnership works, the office becomes calmer, communication becomes clearer, and the entire school is better able to focus on students.
Bryk, A. S., and Schneider, B. (2003). “Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for School Reform.” Educational Leadership, 60(6).
Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., and Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How Principals Affect Students and Schools: A Systematic Synthesis of Two Decades of Research. The Wallace Foundation.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025). “Secretaries and Administrative Assistants.” Occupational Outlook Handbook.
------------------------------
Prepared with the assistance of AI software
OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (5.2) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.