Groups of LI students opt out of new tests

South Side Middle School principal Shelagh McGinn at

Photo credit: Newsday / J. Conrad Williams, Jr. | South Side Middle School principal Shelagh McGinn at a 6th grade class where she spoke with the students about the upcoming state test in Rockville Centre. (April 16, 2013)

Nearly one-third of students at South Side Middle School in Rockville Centre -- 244 in all -- opted out of controversial new state exams Tuesday, amid a statewide protest by parents and teachers against what they describe as abuses of standardized testing.

Test boycotts elsewhere on Long Island were on a smaller scale, as hundreds of thousands of students in grades 3-8 sat down for the first day of annual testing in English and math. Testing requires a total of seven to nine hours, depending on grade level, spread over six days.

In Oceanside, 15 students declined to be tested. Twenty-two opted out in Mount Sinai, 24 in William Floyd and about 45 in Middle Country.


A New York City advocacy group, Time Out from Testing, estimated that several hundred families there boycotted assessments Tuesday. City school officials said official numbers would not be ready until June.

This year's tests, for the first time, reflect new national Common Core curriculum standards, generally considered more rigorous than those used in the past. For this reason, state authorities have warned that passing rates statewide could fall 30 percentage points or more when tests are scored in the summer.

In Rockville Centre, a total of 309 students in six schools declined to be tested -- by far the largest such action of its type in the Island's recent history. Eighth-graders, who rank among those facing the largest number of state tests each year, constituted nearly half the total.

"Albany should understand that we're sending a message here," said Giulia Hamacher, a village resident and market analyst whose son, Adam, 14, was one of the eighth-graders opting out.

Hamacher, 49, said her objections to the state's assessment program revolved largely around the time required for test-prep exercises. Tuesday, her son spent his testing period reading the novel "Kidnapped" by Robert Louis Stevenson, the mother said.

"We need outside-the-box thinkers in this country," Hamacher added. "And filling in bubbles is not what we need."

At the state Education Department in Albany, officials repeated recent declarations that students opting out would be counted as "not tested." Any schools where test-participation rates fall below 95 percent could be flagged by the state and penalized financially, those officials have said.

"We all want the same thing for our children," said Jonathan Burman, a department spokesman. "We want them to graduate high school ready for the challenges they'll face in college and their careers. So it's hard to understand why parents would forgo the chance to know how their children are progressing."

Critics of the state's revved-up testing contend, on the other hand, that the effort is being pushed too fast and that a growing number of teachers and parents have lost all patience.

"I think it's a very sad day when the only way people can speak out is to boycott something that should be a positive experience," said William Johnson, superintendent of Rockville Centre schools and considered one of the region's foremost educators.

"This is not an easy decision for parents to make -- I'm proud of them," said Jeanette Deutermann, a North Bellmoreparent whose fourth-grader opted out Tuesday. Deutermann estimated that a total of 40 students went untested; local school officials declined to give a figure.

At Massapequa's Unqua Elementary School, testing was disrupted when the building was evacuated because of a threatening message. Students were relocated temporarily to another building, and the district said any assessment not completed Tuesday would resume Friday. With Michael R. Ebert

Views: 1296

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

For those of you in districts where students are opting out, how are you handling deciding whether or not any of these students should receive AIS the following year?

If the state assessments are the only way that eligibility for AIS services is determined, then we need to have someone rewrite the eligibility standards.  One set of tests and that's it?  Not the best way to service students.

Quoting Jonathan Burman, a NYSED department spokesman. ".....So it's hard to understand why parents would forgo the chance to know how their children are progressing."  This is the ultimate 'party line.'  If a parent wants to know how a child is doing, what about talking to the teacher or school official?  Or does the state department consider this 'not the best way' to find out how a child is doing.  Is this to be interpreted that a New York State way of determining how children are progressing is the best way to go?  Do people really think that any state's way of doing something is the best way to do it? Are we that politically naive? 

I realize the unions are quivering over this, but as  teacher, I fail to see the downside of "seeing" how a student is progressing in relation to the entire student population of his or her grade level. If they all take the test and they all do poorly (unlikely) then the test is flawed. If some fail, they need help. Isn't this the reason we test? This is the same as if every one of our students were to fail one of our tests. That test would probably be flawed. But if a student "opted out" of your classroom test, what would you think? I would think they did not study and were not prepared. If this is an experiment, the only way to give this the old "scientific method" to either prove, or disprove the hypothesis, is for ALL students to participate. I think you give our children less credit than they are worthy of receiving.

When did the Common Core State Standards movement along with the assessments become a 'scientific experiment?  Isn't that supposed to be done before the system is imposed on all students?  

Hi Frank,

I am not saying the "wave of movement" to opt out of new testing is a "scientific experiment." I said, "the only way to give this the old "scientific method" to either prove, or disprove the hypothesis, is for ALL students to participate." I mean that, like any other logical approach to something different or new, we should be "applying" the scientific method to the process to see if it is beneficial or harmful. But the wave of movement that seeks to opt of of testing?... that is more "cult-like" lacking sound reasoning or a logical approach.






School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe.  Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.


Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.


Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)





School Leadership 2.0

© 2024   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service