Does one more year in kindergarten matter?
By Winnie Tam, Centre for University and School Partnership, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
In 2009, the China Development Research Foundation of the State Council launched the One Village One Preschool (OVOP) initiative, with the goal of providing free early childhood education (ECE) access to all young children across China. According to statistics in 2017, almost all children (98%) in urban areas have access to ECE while only 30% of children from poor and rural areas have the same access. OVOP includes the facilities, teaching components, and policy and organizational operations, through which children of a village can access preschool education without spending hours of commuting time. Using students’ data during the years 2015 to 2018 from Songtao county in Guizhou, one of the poorest provinces in China, Chen and colleagues explored the effect of an ECE education experience on academic performance in grade 1 to grade 4. Five types of ECE education experiences were compared:
1.     Township public ECE centers: supported by public funds and usually with better quality and facilities
2.     Township private ECE centres
3.     3-year OVOP ECE
4.     2-year OVOP ECE
5.     No-ECE
In general, students who went to public township kindergartens had the highest SES, followed by private township. The three other groups had a similar background with lowest SES. Multinomial propensity score matching was conducted to try to reduce selection bias. Academic achievement, which was measured by each school year’s total final test scores in Chinese, Mathematics and English, was compared.
By examining 1st grade exam results:
·      Township public group scored the highest among five groups, followed by 3-year OVOP, 2-year OVOP, township private, and lastly no-ECE groups.
·      No-ECE students scored significantly lower than the other four groups.
·      There was no significant difference between 3-year OVOP and 2-year OVOP.
Concerning academic growth from grade 1 to grade 4:
·      The 3-year OVOP group grew faster than the township public group and decreased their gap with that group from 0.14 SD (grade 1) to 0.05 SD by 4th grade.
·      The 2-year OVOP group grew slower than the 3-year OVOP and tailed behind the 3-year OVOP from 0.02 SD (grade 1) to 0.18 SD by 4th grade.
In sum, the township public group consistently achieved the highest grade on average.
The 3-year-OVOP and 2-year-OVOP groups started off at the same level at first year, however, the 3-year-OVOP group had a faster growth than the 2-year-OVOP so that the 2-year-OVOP lagged the 3-year-OVOP by almost 0.2 SD by 4th grade. Students with no-ECE consistently scored the lowest.
Authors concluded that 1 additional year of OVOP made a huge difference in student learning. While the 2-year-OVOP group did not catch up to the test scores of the 3-year-OVOP, the gap in academic performance between the latter group and township public was narrowed.

Views: 48

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2026   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service