Dealing with Eight Types of Difficult and Resistant Staff

Dealing with Eight Types of Difficult and Resistant Staff

 

From the Marshall Memo #453

In this helpful article in Principal, John Eller (St. Cloud State University) and Sheila Eller (a Minnesota elementary principal) suggest strategies for working with negative staff members who, even if they are small in number, can have a major impact on morale and school effectiveness. The authors suggest analyzing why a person might be resistant to change (Are they losing something important? Have they had negative experiences with change in the past?) and choosing which venue is best for addressing their resistance to change. If it’s a face-to-face “difficult conversation”, Eller and Eller say it’s important to set a serious tone, clearly describe the problem with specific examples, tell the person exactly what needs to be changed or addressed, and describe how you will follow up. “The most successful difficult conversations are well planned, clear, and let the employee know that the principal means business,” they say. 

Eller and Eller go on to describe eight types of difficult and resistant colleagues and possible strategies with each:

Underminers – Characteristics: Say they will comply when they’re with you, then criticize and fail to implement behind your back. Strategies: Give everyone a chance to share concerns in private and public; check on implementation in their classrooms; confront noncompliance in a difficult conversation.

Contrarians – Characteristics: Believe that if they don’t speak up, no one else will; ignore other perspectives. Strategies: Structure pro-and-con discussions with all staff about new ideas; ask that an idea or strategy be discussed with respect to its impact on teaching and learning; confront the behavior in a difficult conversation.

Recruiters – Characteristics: Try to win over others to their point of view; drop the names of those who, they say, agree with them. Strategies: Help others develop the strength to resist being recruited; challenge recruiters to be specific about those who supposedly agree with them; confront the behavior in a difficult conversation.

The challenged – Characteristics: Believe they’re doing a good job and don’t need to change; cover up their lack of knowledge. Strategies: Ask them specific questions to see if they truly understand what’s being proposed; determine what information is missing and provide opportunities for them to learn the required skills, which might include coaching, peer modeling, and conferencing.

Retired on the job – Characteristics: Are open about not being motivated to change or improve. Strategies: Say you understand their situation but state your expectations about the work that is required; follow up with classroom visits.

Resident experts – Characteristics: Broadcast their knowledge about every issue; when they make mistakes, blame others or outside circumstances; make excuses when you want to observe them implementing new ideas or techniques. Strategies: Privately ask them specific questions to assess their knowledge; hold them accountable when they make errors; confront the behavior in a difficult conversation.

Unelected representatives – Characteristics: Claim to represent a group or viewpoint without others’ permission. Strategies: Ask the colleagues they claim to represent if they are in agreement; confront the behavior in a difficult conversation; conduct open conversations about the issues in which everyone has a chance to speak.

Whiners and complainers – Characteristics: Find fault with everything; fail to take responsibility for issues in their classrooms or professional practice; go overboard in talking about issues and problems. Strategies: Hold pro-and-con conversations in which positive ideas as well as concerns are aired; confront in a difficult conversation; don’t accept irrational explanations; ask them to reframe the situation and reduce the melodrama.

“Working Productively with Difficult and Resistant Staff” by John Eller and Sheila Eller in Principal, September/October 2012 (Vol. 92, #1, p. 28-31), www.naesp.org

Views: 1919

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yes, every faculty has difficult and resistant people. They do come in several varieties. However, a few notes of caution and a little dose of advice on how to deal with these folks.

First, let me make a few assumptions: (1) almost everyone comes to work everyday and brings their A game-- if that doesn't measure up to professional standards, then treat it like a professional development opportunity; (2) supervisors should never get sucked into looking and acting like middle school bullies by being governed as if these are win-lose situations; (3) the faculty is made up of intelligent people who see naysayers for what they are and most don't want to get involved with petty school politics; (4) if you give it more energy than it deserves, like fertilizing weeds, it will likely grow, and you don't want to squander your energies in unproductive ways; (5) deal with potential problems privately; (6) supervise to the evidence, meaning gather data and artifacts as they relate to teaching and learning, and compliance with procedures and policy; (7) if there is evidence that someone is under-performing, then deal with it as an opportunity for staff development and supervision; and (8) we all learn best and change our behaviors as a result of reflecting on our own practices and deciding that we need to make corrective actions.

In short, the supervisor is the professional, is a role model and never acts like a bully.

RSS

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe.  Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

FOLLOW SL 2.0

© 2024   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service