Comparing Countries' Instructional Hours

Ed Week

Ask parents how much time their students spend in school, and many answer, "Not enough."

Ask students, and many say, "Too much."

Ask the public, and the answer might be, "Less than students in other countries." Is that really true?

"There is a perception among policymakers and the public that U.S. students spend less time in school than students in other countries," reports The Center for Public Education in its study of instructional hours called "Time in School: How Does the U.S. Compare?"

In fact, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan once said children in India and China go to school 25 to 30 percent longer than children in the U.S. Researchers for the center started their evaluation with this comparison.

Calculations of U.S. instructional hours show that hours spent in school vary according to state mandate, with most states requiring between 175 and 180 days of school—which translates into between 900 and 1,000 instructional hours per year.

The center's researchers found that, in India, students at the middle school level spend 220 days a year in the classroom, but their 1,000 instructional hours mirror those in much of the U.S. China middle school students receive a similar number of instructional hours.

Other countries' hours of instruction for middle school students (for the sake of comparison here) were:


  • England 925

  • Finland 777

  • Japan 868

  • Korea 867

  • Mexico 1167

  • Sweden 741

Korea, Finland, and Japan are all considered high-performing countries, based on their students' scores on international tests.

For parents and the public, the center's study comes to this conclusion:

"The U.S. does not require schools to provide less instructional time than other countries. Basing policy decisions on this false perception alone could be costly and provide no clear benefits. Providing extra time is only useful if that time is used wisely. As the Center's report "Making Time" found, the relationship between time and student learning is not about the amount of time spent in school. Rather, it is how effectively that time is used.

"And this report has also shown that there is no relationship between simply requiring more time and increased achievement. The data shows that a number of countries that require fewer hours of instruction outperform the U.S., while the U.S. performs as well as or better than some other countries that require more hours of instruction."

More from "Time in School: How Does the U.S. Compare?" is available here, and from the center's earlier "Making Time" report, which covers what happens when more time is devoted to instruction,here.

Views: 125

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2025   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service