A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Smart distractions
A report from the LSE (London School of Economics and Political Science) Centre for Economic Performance looks at changes in student test scores after schools banned students from using cell phones.
The authors analyzed data for individual student performance on high-stake exams before and after a ban on cell phones in school (130,482 observations) and found an overall increase of 5.67% of a standard deviation in across-school and across-year test scores.
When student characteristics, prior peer achievement, and changes in school leadership/policies were taken into account, the average student's test results in a school that banned cell phones were 6.41% of a standard deviation higher than scores from students at schools that allowed cell phones.
A particularly striking finding was that the overall improvements in test results were led by the lowest-achieving students and banning cell phones had no significant impact on high-achieving students. This led the authors to suggest that restrictions on cell phones may be a low-cost way to reduce educational inequalities.
Johns Hopkins University
Research in Brief
News Blast
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.