A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
by Michael Keany
Staffing a high school is remarkably similar to assembling a championship baseball team. Both require strategic recruitment, thoughtful development, balanced roles, and a culture that continuously elevates performance. Just as winning ballclubs thrive by nurturing rookies, cultivating utility players, and developing all-stars, effective schools depend on purposeful staffing practices that recognize diverse strengths and invest in long-term success.
In baseball, no franchise builds a future without rookies. These first-year players bring enthusiasm, fresh perspectives, and untapped talent—but also require structured coaching, patient development, and steady encouragement. Schools face a similar challenge with early-career teachers. Research consistently shows that new educators are among the most vulnerable to burnout, largely due to heavy workloads and insufficient support (Ingersoll, 2012).
Just as a baseball team assigns rookies to skilled coaches and offers gradual exposure to high-pressure situations, schools must provide new teachers with:
Meaningful mentorships with experienced educators
Instructional coaching cycles focused on building confidence and skill
Reduced non-instructional burdens during the first year
Opportunities for reflection and feedback
Rookies develop best when surrounded by veterans who model professionalism, classroom management, and effective instructional design—much like young players who learn by observing seasoned teammates. Investing in new teachers isn’t optional; it’s the foundation of a school’s long-term strength.
A championship baseball team always includes “utility players”—individuals who may not be superstars but can play multiple positions, fill unexpected gaps, and keep the team moving when challenges arise. The educational equivalent is the adaptable educator: the teacher who can lead an advisory program, coordinate a club, teach multiple course levels, step in during emergencies, or mentor students others struggle to reach.
These staff members bring versatility and stability. They:
Support colleagues during transitions
Bridge programs across grade levels
Strengthen school culture
Provide continuity when staffing shortages arise
Schools often overlook these utility players because their contributions come quietly and steadily, yet their impact is enormous. They are the glue that holds complex systems together. Research on school improvement highlights that distributed expertise—not just individual excellence—drives lasting organizational success (Spillane, 2006). Valuing and retaining these educators is essential to creating a resilient staff.
Baseball all-stars elevate every player around them. They anchor the lineup, model excellence, and drive championship performance. In high schools, all-stars are master teachers—those with deep content knowledge, proven instructional practice, and the ability to influence the professional growth of peers.
Highly effective teachers deliver improved academic outcomes, contribute to stronger school culture, and often serve as informal leaders (Hattie, 2009). But like all-star athletes, they don’t emerge by accident. They are developed through:
Continuous professional learning
Leadership opportunities such as coaching or leading PLCs
Recognition of their expertise
Strong collaboration networks
When schools intentionally grow all-stars, they build internal capacity that lasts well beyond a single year. These educators become catalysts for innovation and instructional excellence.
Baseball teams fail when they rely too heavily on all-stars or assume rookies can carry the load. The same is true in schools. A successful high school staff blends:
The energy of rookies
The stability of utility players
The expertise of all-stars
This balance creates a sustainable ecosystem where teachers support one another, share ideas, and collaborate for student success. Just as general managers design rosters with long-term strategy, principals must cultivate staffing plans that anticipate retirements, turnover, enrollment changes, and program expansions.
Ultimately, championship teams—and great schools—aren’t built by accident. They emerge from intentional investment in people, a long-view of talent development, and a culture where everyone believes in the mission.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
Ingersoll, R. (2012). Beginning Teacher Induction: What the Data Tell Us. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(8), 47–51.
Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
------------------------------
Prepared with the assistance of AI software
OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.