A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Author: Sadie McCleary, Director of Content and Strategy, Teach Like a Champion
Source: Teach Like a Champion — Doug Lemov's Field Notes
Published: November 1, 2026
Original Article: Read the Full Article
Having a well-written lesson plan doesn't guarantee an effective lesson. The difference often lies in what teachers do after the plan is written but before instruction begins.
In her November 2026 article, Sadie McCleary distinguishes between lesson planning and lesson preparation. Lesson planning establishes what students will learn, the activities they will complete, and the sequence of instruction. Lesson preparation focuses on the instructional decisions that make those plans successful.
Drawing on examples from highly effective classrooms, McCleary identifies four preparation practices: developing exemplary responses, anticipating student errors, planning purposeful observation, and designing meaningful participation.
These practices help teachers recognize misconceptions, respond intelligently to student thinking, and make adjustments during instruction.
The central message is powerful: Effective teachers don't simply plan what they will teach. They prepare for how students will think, respond, struggle, and learn.
Before teaching, effective teachers complete the essential questions and assignments themselves, creating models of what excellent student work should demonstrate.
These exemplars identify the specific vocabulary, reasoning, evidence, and explanations students should produce.
For example, in a reading lesson, a teacher might write an ideal response that includes textual evidence and explains why that evidence supports a conclusion.
The instructional advantage: Teachers can distinguish between students who have truly mastered a concept and those whose answers are merely partially correct.
Great teachers don't wait until students make mistakes to decide how to respond.
They anticipate likely misunderstandings and prepare questions that will help students correct their own thinking.
McCleary describes these as Back Pocket Questions (BPQs)—carefully prepared prompts teachers can use when students struggle.
For example, a teacher who anticipates that students might identify textual evidence without explaining its significance could prepare the question:
“How does that sentence help prove your answer?”
The instructional advantage: Teachers respond to errors thoughtfully rather than improvising explanations that may not address the underlying misconception.
Circulating around the classroom is valuable only when teachers know what evidence of learning they are seeking.
Effective preparation identifies the particular student behaviors, answers, and misunderstandings teachers will monitor.
During one classroom circulation, a teacher might examine whether students selected appropriate evidence. During another, the focus might shift to whether students can explain their reasoning.
The instructional advantage: Classroom circulation becomes purposeful formative assessment rather than general supervision.
Effective teachers carefully design how students will participate in each instructional activity.
Instead of simply asking a question and accepting responses from volunteers, teachers might sequence participation:
Individual Writing → Turn and Talk → Cold Call → Whole-Class Discussion
This approach allows students to develop their thinking independently, rehearse their ideas with peers, and contribute to a broader discussion.
The instructional advantage: More students engage intellectually, and teachers collect better evidence of what the entire class understands.
McCleary highlights a particularly practical technique called Standardize the Format.
Teachers annotate their own copies of student assignments rather than maintaining separate, complicated preparation documents.
This makes it easier to compare student responses with expected answers and monitor progress during instruction.
The instructional advantage: Preparation becomes immediately useful during teaching rather than another document sitting on a desk.
The distinction between planning and preparation has important implications for teacher supervision, instructional coaching, and professional development.
Schools frequently evaluate lesson plans for alignment with standards, learning objectives, instructional activities, and assessments. However, these documents reveal relatively little about how teachers will respond when students misunderstand a concept or how teachers will determine whether learning is occurring.
McCleary's framework suggests that instructional leaders should focus less exclusively on lesson-plan compliance and more on the quality of teachers' instructional decision-making.
Rather than asking, “Did the teacher follow the plan?” principals might ask, “How effectively did preparation help the teacher respond to student learning?”
This shift supports more meaningful professional conversations and better classroom instruction.
1. Introduce the Four-Move Framework.
Use a faculty meeting or professional learning community to distinguish lesson planning from lesson preparation. Invite teachers to examine how they currently anticipate student thinking.
2. Make Exemplar Planning a Collaborative Practice.
Have grade-level or departmental teams complete important student assignments together and agree on what constitutes a high-quality response.
3. Develop Banks of Back Pocket Questions.
Encourage teachers to identify common misconceptions and prepare targeted questions that redirect students toward deeper understanding.
4. Strengthen Classroom Observation Practices.
During instructional walkthroughs, examine whether teachers circulate with a clear purpose, gather evidence of learning, and adjust their instruction accordingly.
5. Reduce Unnecessary Planning Paperwork.
Allow teachers to annotate existing curriculum materials rather than requiring lengthy lesson-plan documents that provide limited instructional value.
If you examined the lesson plans produced by teachers in your school, how much would those documents reveal about their preparation for student misconceptions, classroom participation, and real-time instructional decisions?
What would change if teacher collaboration and instructional coaching emphasized these four practices instead of simply checking whether required lesson-plan components were completed?
© Michael Keany + AI 2026
Source: McCleary, Sadie. “Beyond the Lesson Plan: The Four Moves of Effective Lesson Preparation.” Teach Like a Champion, November 1, 2026.
------------------------------
Prepared with the assistance of AI software OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (5.2) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
NOW LISTED AT #15!
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations. Click here to explore and contribute an article.
Also, consider the exciting learning opportunity offered through the Mentors.net AI Academy.