“All the Research Says…” – but Does It Really?


From the Marshall Memo #428

In this helpful American School Board Journal column, author/consultant Douglas Reeves has advice on being a critical consumer of educational research: 

Independence – There should be five levels, says Reeves: (a) Ideally, the conclusions should come from several different researchers who are genuinely independent from one another, even competing; (b) conclusions are more compelling when they come from different samples and not “samples of convenience” – schools, students, and teachers who happened to be available; (c) it’s ideal if different researchers used different methods – quantitative, qualitative, meta-analyses; (d) conclusions are more robust if they come from different venues – east coast/west coast, urban/suburban/rural, etc.; (e) Data should come from different student populations – high and low poverty, ELLs, etc. – so the conclusions stem from teaching and leadership, not demographics.

Precise terminology – A number of labels – “professional learning communities”, “differentiated instruction”, “response to intervention” – are used loosely among educators and researchers. “When evaluating competing research claims,” says Reeves, “leaders and policymakers must distinguish such labels from actual implementation.”

Candor – “Beware of the researcher who is always right,” says Reeves. “Every credible researcher – bar none – will have no difficulty in finding examples of misguided hypotheses and misdirected conclusions. The best researchers will have published those failures and acknowledged them in front of peers and the public.” 

Replication – “Research is littered with personal narratives of the heroic teacher or principal who succeeded against the odds,” says Reeves. But it’s convincing only if the approach has been used successfully in different places and different conditions.  

“Research Shows” by Douglas Reeves in American School Board Journal, April 2012 (Vol. 199, #4, p. 36-37), http://www.asbj.com; Reeves is at dreeves@leadandlearn.com


Views: 120

Reply to This

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2025   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service