A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
6 Things We’re Getting Wrong About Tech Integration
Despite years of investment, many schools are still missing the mark on technology integration. Here’s what the experts told us needs to change—and how to get started this year.
By Paige Tutt
Edutopia
August 1, 2025
By Paige Tutt Published August 1, 2025
Original article: https://www.edutopia.org/article/6-tech-integration-mistakes
In 6 Things We’re Getting Wrong About Tech Integration, Paige Tutt outlines persistent challenges in K–12 educational technology use and offers expert-driven solutions to improve classroom integration. Despite pandemic-era investments and rapid adoption, many schools still lack sustainable, pedagogically sound strategies for using technology effectively.
Districts often purchase edtech tools without sufficient teacher training or time to experiment. Michelle Manning, an instructional technology integration specialist, notes that without ongoing onboarding and feedback, investments fail to yield results. Recommendations:
Offer varied professional learning opportunities, from in-person demos to short, on-demand tutorial videos.
Revisit tools after trial periods to gather teacher feedback and adjust use accordingly.
Provide in-class modeling and co-teaching to build confidence.
Technology purchases often exclude key stakeholders, creating a disconnect between instructional needs and IT concerns. Collaboration can be tense—educators may feel IT doesn’t grasp instructional challenges, while IT staff focus on security and compliance. Recommendations:
Form digital vetting committees including administrators, teachers, IT staff, and edtech specialists.
Review usage data, costs, and alignment with instructional goals.
Avoid “trend chasing” by prioritizing tools with clear instructional value.
Post-pandemic, technology became omnipresent in lessons, sometimes without clear purpose. Without guidelines, teachers may feel pressure to use devices even when unnecessary. Recommendations:
Begin with instructional goals, then choose whether tech enhances them.
Use digital tools for creative, open-ended projects rather than defaulting to device-based instruction.
Normalize low-tech options like paper-based activities when more efficient.
Poorly established routines lead to distraction and misuse. Instructional coach Alyssa Faubion stresses that classroom management should precede device use. Recommendations:
Set clear, consistent expectations for when and how devices are used.
Use verbal/nonverbal cues (e.g., “shark mode” for partially closed laptops during direct instruction).
Reinforce routines until they become automatic, and explicitly teach device care and information security.
Some educators sideline devices due to connectivity issues and distractions. However, avoiding tech entirely can worsen the digital divide and leave students unprepared for computer-based assessments. Dirk Hastedt, of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, warns that the “digital native” myth obscures the need for intentional digital literacy instruction. Recommendations:
Balance screen time by integrating purposeful device use alongside non-digital tasks.
Teach navigation skills for online testing environments to ensure results reflect true knowledge, not technical hurdles.
In many classrooms, tech use is passive—watching videos, filling digital worksheets—while students’ outside-school tech use is often highly creative. Recommendations:
Incorporate tools like Canva, Bookcreator, and Adobe Express to foster original student products.
Encourage multimedia projects such as podcasts, tutorials, animations, and digital storytelling.
Design assignments that tap into students’ creativity while demonstrating learning.
Purpose before platform: Select technology that enhances, not overshadows, instructional goals.
Professional learning is essential: Teachers need training, time, and ongoing support to integrate tech meaningfully.
Collaboration is critical: Cross-role teams should guide purchasing and vetting decisions.
Digital literacy matters: Students must be explicitly taught to navigate digital tools for learning and assessment.
Creation drives engagement: Balance consumption with opportunities for students to produce original work.
By addressing these six missteps, schools can move from reactive, tool-driven adoption toward a more intentional, sustainable, and equitable model of technology integration.
------------------------------
Prepared with the assistance of AI software
OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Tags:
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.