Why principals should be wary of homework by Kenneth Goldberg

Why principals should be wary of homework

Changing the homework structure for greater student success

Few topics generate as much debate in education as homework. Experts disagree on its educational value, and research offers little clarification. Teachers and parents vary in how much homework they think children should do. So where do principals fit into the homework system?

The principal oversees the school heirarchy, injecting him or herself as needed, in a school building, during school hours. But with homework, the structure changes.

Instead of one building, there are many different spaces where students do homework. Instead of one teacher—working for the principal—to oversee the work, there are parents and guardians. Instead of fixed hours, assignments are done at times that may conflict with family priorities of which the principal is unaware.

The principal can control what takes place in the school, but in the home, the principal has no such control.

Conflicting messages

In school, children are expected to work and learn for a fixed amount of time. At home, they are expected to work on their assignments until they get them done. In school, teachers can observe children as they work. For homework, teachers only see what the children produce.

When people face situations they cannot control, they typically respond by upping the penalties. The consequences for not doing homework are considerably more severe than consequences for schoolwork difficulties. Sixty percent is a failing grade. Undone homework garners a zero, which is two-and-a-half times more consequential than an ordinary F. Homework may count as much as 25 percent of the grade, even though it is not supposed to consume that much time relative to the school day.

Penalties do not motivate children who consistently skip homework to do their work, but they do mobilize parents, often creating a situation that only increases tensions within the home. At the root of this is a misunderstanding of why some children don’t do their work.

If the child has trouble in class, we observe the child at work before presuming what type of problem he or she has. But at home, parents assume the child only needs to try harder. This is not only a false perspective, but also a self-fulfilling prophecy that causes children to become unnecessarily distressed.

These children come to school not refreshed and refueled for the day. They may be angry over penalties given them at home, and they may expect to feel embarrassed when homework gets checked. They act as if they don’t care, and often act out in other ways as well. Many behavioral problems displayed at school are actually rooted in penalties for work not done at home.

The solution

Views: 374

Comment

You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!

Join School Leadership 2.0

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2025   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service