A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Measuring the Quality of Math Instruction
In this sidebar to a longer Ed. article on teaching Common Core math, David McKay Wilson reports on the Mathematical Quality of Instruction tool (MQI) for evaluating K-8 mathematics teaching. Developed by Heather Hill at the University of Michigan and Harvard’s Graduate School of Education, the MQI is designed to give observers a better lens and get teachers self-assessing and bringing more mathematical substance to students. The MQI
measures five key components of math instruction:
• Richness of the mathematics – Does the teacher explain ideas well and make connections between different ideas (e.g., fractions and ratios) and different representations of the same idea (e.g., a number line, counters, and a number sentence)? Does the teacher include different solution methods, generalizations from specific examples, and fluent and precise mathematical language?
• Working with students – Is the teacher “hearing” and understanding what students are saying mathematically, responding appropriately, and remediating misunderstandings thoroughly, with attention to the specific misunderstandings that led to the errors?
• Errors and imprecision – Is the teacher making mathematical errors and/or using language and notation imprecisely (for example, telling students that 0.5 percent is one-half when it’s really one-half of one percent)?
• Student participation in meaning-making and reasoning – Are students asking questions and reasoning about mathematics (e.g., examining claims and counter-claims or making conjectures)? Are students providing mathematical explanations, finding patterns, drawing connections, determining the meaning of math concepts, and explaining and justifying their conclusions?
• How classroom work is connected to math – Does the work have a mathematical point, or is the bulk of instructional time spent on activities that do not develop mathematical ideas (e.g., coloring, cutting, and pasting) or on transitions and discipline problems?
“Teachers Need Help, Too” by David McKay Wilson in Ed., Winter 2013 (p. 28-29), http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news-impact/2013/01/do-the-math; Hill can be reached at heather_hill@gse.harvard.edu and the website for the MQI is
http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=mqi_training&pagei...
From the Marshall Memo #469
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.
You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!
Join School Leadership 2.0