Selective schools not necessarily better
New analysis by the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) in the UK shows there is no academic benefit to attending partially selective schools. Partially selective schools admit a proportion of students by academic ability and/or subject aptitude and a proportion by commonly used non-selective criteria. The NFER identified 38 partially selective schools in England that select more than 10% of students on the basis of ability or aptitude, but are not wholly selective grammar schools. Of these 38 schools, 20 selected students on academic ability alone. The next most common criterion was academic ability and musical aptitude (10 schools). Four schools selected by aptitude for music alone.The remaining schools selected students using a mixture of academic ability and different aptitudes.
The findings of the analysis by Karen Wespieser and colleagues revealed that students with high prior achievement make less progress in math at partially selective schools than their peers at non-selective schools (up to five percentage points). Students with low prior achievement are less likely to achieve five A* to C GCSEs (GSCEs are high-stakes exams taken in a range of subjects by secondary school students in England), including English and math, than students at non-selective schools (up to eight percentage points). In addition, they find that admissions policies at some partially selective schools may act as a barrier to applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Johns Hopkins University
Research in Brief
News Blast
You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!
Join School Leadership 2.0