Is the Tea Party Right About the Common Core? By Anthony Cody

Is the Tea Party Right About the Common Core?

Yesterday's Washington Post carried a banner story about growing Tea Party opposition to the Common Core. We learn that across the country, Tea Party activists have been organizing around opposition to the Common Core, and have succeeded in blocking or delaying the standards in at least nine states.

There has been a contemptuous reaction from the highest levels of our educational system. Arne Duncan has implied that opponents are tin-foil hatted paranoids: "It's not a black helicopter ploy and we're not trying to get inside people's minds and brains," he said last week. A week before he responded to questions at Capital Hill, saying "Let's not get caught up in hysteria and drama." And of course corporate-funded conservatives like Jeb Bush, and the Fordham Institute are still on board all the way. 

The problem they have is that the substance of the Tea Party criticism of Common Core standards is solid.
 And it aligns pretty well with what many of us a bit more to the left have been saying for years. Let's take the arguments, as presented by this Washington Post article and elsewhere, and check them out.

Click here to continue reading.

Views: 190

Comment

You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!

Join School Leadership 2.0

Comment by Katie Zahedi on June 5, 2013 at 11:56am

 No matter who makes a criticism of the heavy-handed, political domination of education reform, the concerns should be heard and evaluated.  Indeed, it should be a concern to all parents (conservative or liberal) when dictates are imposed on public education by politicians and their apointees to leadership in education who often have very little experience in public schools.  The public schools serve all children and creating success in a private or charter school setting, while laudable, amounts to creating success in a controlled environment.  If, as a nation, we are serious about improving U.S. public education and if we are prepared to make it a genuine priority, then our secretary of education and all state commissioners should have at least ten years in the public school classroom and ten years as a principal in public school.  The expedited certification of hand-picked individuals to lead the state and federal levels of school reform, who are beholden to their political sponsors, is a recipe for failure. This is the case because inexperienced leaders make decisions that are not grounded in a good understanding of the conditions that their policies will influence and they also  lack the wisdom that comes with experience. There are plenty of committed and qualified individuals working in schools that should serve as the pool for selecting leadership

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe.  Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

FOLLOW SL 2.0

© 2024   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service