High Stakes Testing Hits Home by By LORI UNGEMAH

High Stakes Testing Hits Home

Stephen Nessen

As a high school teacher for 10 years, I felt firsthand the frenzy that takes over during testing season. I also witnessed how testing infected the wider school culture. But I never expected it to affect me on a personal level. Now, as a parent, I’ve learned I cannot save my own children from an educational experience dominated by test prep, and a curriculum that puts testing at its foundation.

When I was a teacher, my students felt the pressure of the Regents exams from the start of ninth grade. The curriculum narrowed for the tests and then it narrowed some more. The Department of Education funded after-school test-prep classes. Every formative and summative assessment had to model a part of the Regents exam for our subject areas. Testing became the norm and – as teachers – our hands were tied.

And I let it be that way. Testing was stronger than I was and, quite honestly, I wanted my students to pass because I saw the joy and pride they felt when they were successful. I learned to be a test-prep expert, a cog in the machine of testing. But I always assumed the testing culture was a result of our student body which was overwhelmingly poor and filled with students who entered high school performing far below grade level, a population the system deemed “at risk.”

Surely it would be different at my local high-performing elementary school in a neighborhood I could barely afford to live in. I thought my class privilege would save my own children from an education dominated by testing. How wrong I was.

Last spring the principal of my daughter’s elementary school notified parents about a change in the schedule. Regular classes would end earlier so that there could targeted instruction in small groups focused on reading, writing, and math.

As an educator, I immediately suspected this was about test preparation. You can’t play a player. When I asked non-educator parents about the changes they only expressed frustration about the early pick-up time while all my educator friends replied in a skinny second: “testing.” This was all about testing.

And I know how it works: it begins with the after-school tutoring, then the test prep seeps into the curriculum and soon the entire school experience is about testing and only testing. And this is at a high-performing school in a neighborhood of over-educated parents who own million-dollar apartments and brownstones. High-stakes testing is everywhere in the public school system.

I did not expect this for my own children.

I went to my first PTA meeting two months ago. The P.S. 39 principal, Anita de Paz, spoke eloquently about her personal journey with high-stakes testing. She defined what the term “high-stakes” means and how she has wrestled with it and its shape-shifting manifestations.

She was very honest: she told us that she gets a $10,000 bonus if the school test scores are good. She emphasized that she is not against testing, nor against teachers being assessed. She told us that this year it was mandated that the school’s Comprehensive Educational Plan (CEP), a list of goals that drive the school during the academic year, be exclusively about test scores. Still, she reassured us, she and the teachers at P.S. 39 saw our children as whole people, not as test scores.

She concluded that she cannot do much to retaliate against this testing culture. But we can. The power is in the parents, she said. The revolution has to start with us.

Lori Ungemah, Ed.D., is a parent and a former New York City teacher. She taught English at the now-closed I.S. 111 and at the Cobble Hill School of American Studies. She currently is an assistant professor of English at the New Community College at CUNY.

Views: 110

Comment

You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!

Join School Leadership 2.0

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2025   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service