A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Douglas Reeves Makes the Case for Teaching Handwriting
From the Marshall Memo #446
In this thoughtful American School Board Journal article, author/consultant Douglas Reeves asks whether teaching cursive is worth the time and effort schools used to put into it. Handwriting is still a hot-button issue for many educators and parents. What’s the right course of action, given the shortage of time in the school day?
“Handwriting has been in our intellectual toolbox for about 6,000 years,” says Reeves, “with the printing press occupying a scant half millennium and computerized fonts only a few decades of that relatively short spectrum of human history.” Teaching handwriting was once a major component of the elementary curriculum, with millions of students spending hours learning the Palmer Method. But in recent decades, handwriting instruction has declined to an average of ten minutes a day in elementary classrooms. Graders of standardized writing exams are explicitly told to focus on content, not how letters and words are written.
It’s tempting to continue this de-emphasis of handwriting, says Reeves, but he urges us to push back. “By diminishing handwriting, we diminish student confidence and fluency in writing,” he argues. “And when we diminish student writing, we risk catastrophic consequences for student skills in reading comprehension, math, science, social studies, and interpersonal communication. Just as skills in keyboarding, Web design, and oral communication open the door of opportunity for students, so do handwriting skills. Students need multiple methods of communication in the 21st century. Each of these skills requires the care and attention of teachers, parents, and students.”
Fluency in handwriting is closely linked to fluency in written expression and achievement across all subject areas, says Reeves, citing the work of Steve Graham at Vanderbilt University. He suggests two simulations:
“[R]eaders attribute traits of intelligence and character to those who take the time and care to write neatly,” says Reeves. “It may not be fair, but it is reality.” Students need to learn how to write so their audience can easily understand.
But when are students going to learn good handwriting in the already overcrowded curriculum? Reeves contends that 10-15 minutes a day is not enough to develop proficiency, any more than practicing basketball or soccer that little would produce skilled performance. His suggestion: ask all teachers in all subjects and grades to emphasize handwriting and help students develop the form of expression as well as the content. “The entries on the charts in the fitness classes are as important a form of communication as the lab report in science and the graphs in math,” he says. “Students, factory workers, professionals, and families will continue to need to communicate, a need at the core of what it means to be human. Our decisions about writing will either enhance or diminish the capacities of our children to communicate.”
“The Trouble with Handwriting” by Douglas Reeves in American School Board Journal, August 2012 (Vol. 199, #8, p. 36-37), http://www.asbj.com; Reeves can be reached at dreeves@changeleaders.com.
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.
You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!
Join School Leadership 2.0