A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Does the Common Core Dictate Instructional Methods?
In this feisty Education Gadfly article, Michael Petrilli responds to recent articles criticizing supporters of the Common Core for going back on their initial claim that the new standards won’t prescribe how content is taught in classrooms. Petrilli and others have said that Common Core will bring about important “instructional shifts,” and the critics are saying, Aha! Your loose-tight paradigm was disingenuous! This really is about dictating how teachers teach!
To which Petrilli responds, “Dude, guys, get a grip. Are we hoping that Common Core will lead to instructional change in the classroom? Hell yes! If ‘instructional change’ isn’t what we’re all working toward, through any of our reform efforts, what’s the point? How else do we expect to see improved student achievement?
“The main reason there’s been so little achievement gain over the past few decades arising from the reforms that so many of us have been pressing is precisely because neither curriculum nor instruction much changed – hence the students’ actual classroom experience didn’t much change, and hence the students didn’t learn much more… We believe that schools will do better on the Common Core-aligned assessments if they ask students to read challenging texts, rather than books that are relatively easy for them.
“But guess what? If schools continue to assign kids ‘just right’ texts at their current reading levels and those kids still pass the Common Core assessments – great! From the perspective of the public, that’s what counts. But if we see a lot of failure on the Common Core assessments in 2015 and 2016 and little movement on NAEP, we’ll now have a reasonable hypothesis to explain it: Schools didn’t change their instructional practices, at least as they relate to assigning students more-challenging texts.”
How do we get local school districts to make smart curriculum decisions? asks Petrilli. “Set clear standards, align assessments to those standards, hold educators accountable, and help them find solid curricular materials that synch with the standards.”
“Hell Yes We Want Instructional Change” by Michael Petrilli in The Education Gadfly, Nov. 14, 2013 (Vol. 13, #44), http://www.edexcellence.net/commentary/education-gadfly-weekly#56348
From the Marshall Memo #511
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.
You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!
Join School Leadership 2.0