School Leadership 2.0
A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Does growth-mindset intervention at scale work?
Does growth-mindset intervention at scale work?
By Jun Wang, Johns Hopkins University
|
Students with growth mindsets believe their abilities are malleable through hard work, which in turn, will positively influence their school performance. A recent study by Ganimian evaluated the effects of a “growth-mindset” intervention at scale with Grade 12 students from 202 public secondary schools in Salta, Argentina. The intervention invited participants to read a passage showing evidence that one’s intelligence can be developed through practicing challenging tasks, followed by a brief exercise to help them internalize the idea.
In this study, the participating schools were randomly assigned to a treatment group (n=102) and a control group (n=100). The treatment group received a single-session growth-mindset intervention during a non-academic period. Then, the survey and scores of the national assessment taken two months after the intervention were used as indicators of the Grade 12 students’ beliefs and school achievements.
The study finds no significant evidence that the growth-mindset intervention can affect students’ perception of difficulty of challenging tasks, self-efficacy, students’ efforts, school climate, school performance, achievement, or post-secondary plans. Moreover, the study shows some evidence that the intervention may have negative impacts on the beliefs of female students, students from low SES families, and students who repeated a grade.
Several points are indicated in this study for future research. First, it is suggested that improvements may only be achieved if students change their beliefs about intelligence after the intervention. Second, the findings in this study differ from the results of efficacy trials in previous research, thus underscoring the importance of evaluating educational interventions at scale while understanding their effectiveness. Third, the context may moderate the effects of the intervention due to the variations in the capacity of implementing the intervention, the margin for potential improvements, the baseline beliefs about intelligence, and supports from schools and teachers.
|
Comment
JOIN SL 2.0
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"
"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."
---------------------------
Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
New Partnership
Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource
Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and
other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching
practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.
© 2025 Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany
Powered by
You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!
Join School Leadership 2.0