We have no meaningful evidence at hand indicating that these tests can accurately distinguish between well taught and badly taught students.” So says testing expert James Popham in the recent PDK Journal regarding the use of tests to evaluate teachers and principals.
There is much evidence against the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers and administrators but those in charge at the Federal and State level seem to adopt the “don’t confuse me with the facts” attitude.
Educators should be accountable for results and they indeed have an obligation to continue to grow as an educator. The problem is the current system makes no sense, is one that no one can explain, and it has created a terrible culture for students and teachers. This cannot be the path that we choose.
Let’s be smart. All districts should institute an evaluation system that is done with fidelity, based on the latest research on effective teaching and learning practices, and a commitment to ongoing training for all staff. Let’s do away with assessments that have arbitrarily high cut scores, and limit the amount of time that students must sit for these assessments. In addition, let’s also limit the amount of class time it takes for teachers to prepare students for these assessments. Let’s not do away or limit the “other” subjects that are not measured by standardized assessments. In addition, let’s commit to working with students on being well rounded and well-adjusted adults.
For the sake of not hurting a generation of students we must act now.
Andy Greene
Co-President
Suffolk County Middle Level Principal Association