Are Online College Courses Widening the Achievement Gap?

Are Online College Courses Widening the Achievement Gap?

In this Chronicle of Higher Education article, Jake New reports on a Columbia University study of online courses taken by more than 40,000 community- and technical-college students in Washington state. The researchers found that students who struggled in traditional classrooms had even more difficulty in online courses. “We found that the gap is stronger in the underrepresented and underprepared students,” said Shanna Smith Jaggars, one of the authors. “They’re falling farther behind than if they were taking face-to-face courses.” Those who did less well included African-American students, males, younger students, and those with lower grade-point averages.

Who benefits from online courses? Older students, those who perform well in traditional classes, and those who are juggling studying with raising a family; for them, the difference between the two formats is less pronounced and online courses might make sense. “They might do a little worse, but over all it’s a pretty good trade-off for the easier access,” said Jaggars. 

Kathy Enger, a Minnesota educator who has been involved in online education for a decade, pushes back. She has found that online courses are helpful to minority students because they can speak up without having to worry about “micro-aggression” – snickering and eye-rolling when they speak up in predominantly white classrooms. “There’s more freedom for students to express themselves and feel validated in an online environment,” she says. Enger also believes that if some students are falling behind in online courses, it’s because the professors aren’t using the format to best advantage. “If it’s not working, find out what’s not working,” she says. “Then make it work.”

Jaggars agrees: “We need a lot more teacher training, showing them tactics to use to try and reach out,” she says. “I think it’s difficult for faculty to know how to do that online. Not that they don’t want to. It’s just hard.” 

“Online Courses Could Widen Achievement Gaps Among Different Types of Students” by Jake New in The Chronicle of Higher Education, Mar. 8, 2013 (Vol. LIX, #26, p. A12); the original study is “Adaptability to Online Learning: Differences Across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas” by Di Xu and Shanna Smith Jaggars, available at:

From the Marshall Memo #476

Views: 78

Comment

You need to be a member of School Leadership 2.0 to add comments!

Join School Leadership 2.0

JOIN SL 2.0

SUBSCRIBE TO

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0

Feedspot named School Leadership 2.0 one of the "Top 25 Educational Leadership Blogs"

"School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe."

---------------------------

 Our community is a subscription-based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership)  that will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one of our links below.

 

Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.

 

Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e., association, leadership teams)

__________________

CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT 

SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM

New Partnership

image0.jpeg

Mentors.net - a Professional Development Resource

Mentors.net was founded in 1995 as a professional development resource for school administrators leading new teacher induction programs. It soon evolved into a destination where both new and student teachers could reflect on their teaching experiences. Now, nearly thirty years later, Mentors.net has taken on a new direction—serving as a platform for beginning teachers, preservice educators, and

other professionals to share their insights and experiences from the early years of teaching, with a focus on integrating artificial intelligence. We invite you to contribute by sharing your experiences in the form of a journal article, story, reflection, or timely tips, especially on how you incorporate AI into your teaching

practice. Submissions may range from a 500-word personal reflection to a 2,000-word article with formal citations.

© 2025   Created by William Brennan and Michael Keany   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service