Summary for Educators 

Article: Teachers Like Cellphone Bans—But Not for Themselves Author: Olina Banerji
Publication: Education Week
Date: January 23, 2026
Source: https://www.edweek.org/technology/teachers-like-cellphone-bans-but-...

In this Education Week article, Olina Banerji examines a growing contradiction in K-12 schools: many teachers support strict cellphone bans for students, yet they resist similar restrictions for their own phone use during the workday. As cellphones have become pervasive in school life—disrupting lessons or distracting students—policymakers and educators have increasingly implemented bans or restrictions during instructional time. However, educators’ own needs and work practices complicate how cellphone policies are applied in practice.

The Context: Cellphone Bans in Schools

In recent years, public opinion and state policies have shifted toward restricting student cellphone use. At least 33 states now require districts to limit cellphone access during the school day or instructional periods, motivated by concerns about distraction, social media misuse, and student well-being. Early research suggests that cellphone bans can lead to more focused classrooms and improved student engagement and even higher test scores, while reducing behavioral infractions. However, some studies also show potential unintended consequences, such as short-term increases in disciplinary actions like suspensions.

Teachers generally appreciate cellphone restrictions when they are well-implemented and backed by clear administrative support. Many educators report that student phones in class lead to off-task behavior, loss of attention, inappropriate photos or videos, and constant disruptions that shift focus away from instruction. Bans provide clarity and support for classroom management, reducing the need for teachers to police students’ phones during lessons.

Teachers Resist Rules for Themselves

Despite widespread backing of student cellphone bans, many teachers object to being included in the same policies. In response to an informal Education Week poll of more than 1,600 educators, more than half said that rules governing cellphone use should not apply to teachers, while about 31 percent said such restrictions should exist for staff. A minority (15 percent) indicated it depends on context.

A common theme among teachers who oppose staff restrictions is the belief that they possess greater self-control and professional judgment than students. Many respondents emphasized the difference between adult and adolescent behavior, arguing that teachers should not be treated like students. Comments published in the article illustrate this sentiment: teachers noted they use phones responsibly, rely on them for job functions, or rarely check phones outside professional needs.

Phones as Professional Tools

For many educators, cellphones are not merely personal devices but essential tools of the job. Teachers rely on phones for tasks such as:

• Logging into work systems that require authentication apps

• Communicating with administrators, colleagues, or parents

• Accessing timers, quick online searches, or instructional resources

• Coordinating student support or behavior management

• Using health-related apps (e.g., for students with medical needs)

Some teachers pointed out that their phones contain work-related content—such as music for instruction, documentation tools, or apps that support classroom logistics. One teacher noted that being prohibited from having a phone at school would hamper their ability to teach effectively.

Administrative Perspectives and Compromise

Some administrators recognize the need for teacher access to phones but still advocate for policies that model responsible use. For example, in Sheridan County (Wyo.), the district’s policy prohibits phones for students but allows staff to keep phones on them with conditions: devices must be on “do not disturb,” and use is limited to emergencies or work needs. The superintendent explained that schools want to reduce distractions for everyone, but they also acknowledge that teachers sometimes need phones to communicate quickly or manage safety concerns.

Other leaders emphasize modeling as a key principle: if teachers are expected to uphold rules about focused learning and limited distractions, how adults themselves use technology can reinforce or undermine those expectations. Some educators in the article described cultural norms they adopt, such as putting phones away during instructional time, using them only during breaks, or being transparent with students about why a phone is needed. These practices aim to balance professional utility with intentional modeling of responsible behavior.

Educational Implications

The article highlights a nuanced policy challenge: while cellphone restrictions can support student focus and classroom management, educators’ professional needs and realities require careful consideration. School leaders should:

• Communicate clear expectations about when and why phones can be used by staff

• Provide alternatives for work-related functions that don’t depend on personal devices

• Encourage professional norms that model appropriate technology use

• Support consistent policies applied with both clarity and flexibility

• Consider how cellphone rules impact classroom culture and adult-student relationships

Ultimately, the debate illustrates that educational technology policies must balance instructional goals, equity, safety, and professional practice rather than simply mirroring student restrictions for adults.

Original Article

Article: Teachers Like Cellphone Bans—But Not for Themselves Author: Olina Banerji
Publication: Education Week
Date: January 23, 2026
Source: https://www.edweek.org/technology/teachers-like-cellphone-bans-but-...

------------------------------

Prepared with the assistance of AI software

OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com