A Network Connecting School Leaders From Around The Globe
Promoting Teacher Effectiveness and Professional Learning
We invite you to join the discussion on a Framework for Teaching.
Through this community we seek to help our members advance their understanding and application of Charlotte Danielson's concepts in the educational community.
Members: 227
Latest Activity: Sep 22, 2019
Started by Dr. Jim Nichols Apr 21, 2014. 0 Replies 0 Likes
Attached is an idea that has worked very well for my student teachers in my ST Seminar. PIP responses are done for first placement and used to create goals for placement 2. NYS requires upper and…Continue
Tags: Idea, Assessment, Danielson
Started by Michael Keany Nov 24, 2012. 0 Replies 2 Likes
Carol Ann Tomlinson on What Evaluation Should Be(Originally titled “The Evaluation of My Dreams”) In this Educational Leadership article, differentiation guru Carol Ann Tomlinson describes her “dream…Continue
Started by Michael Keany Apr 17, 2012. 0 Replies 0 Likes
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: Kati Elliott KEH Communications410-975-9638kati@kehcomm.comBrian K. Fawkes Teachscape 415-369-3131 brian.fawkes@teachscape.comCharlotte Danielson Enhances Framework for…Continue
Started by Dr. Lynnda M. Nadien. Last reply by Judy Dodge Dec 21, 2011. 2 Replies 0 Likes
I have been to several trainings related to the rubric development for the new APPR--We have heard the acronym-- HEDI Highly Effective, Effective, Developing and Ineffectiveand then we have been…Continue
Comment
Jim:
Yes, you can just click on +Discussion on he group’s homepage and cut and paste your document. I’m sure the entire group would be interested.
I have been using the Danielson framework for several years as the required text for our Student Teaching Seminar. It provides excellent focus for goal setting and reflection on student teaching performance. I have created a highly effective self assessment/PIP instrument using Danielson,which I would be glad to share. Is there a way to upload to the DLC?
You are most welcome. I think its important to use the Framework in the humane and supportive way that was the original intent. My experience leads me to believe strongly that we can positively influence the choices our students and teachers make, and help them become highly skilled, if we think outside of the rubric boxes and don't take everything too literally. Examples are just that....examples.
Our Huntington Schools administrators also did the online Teachscape certification program. Although I like the concept of having the group watch the same video, we found many of the teaching videos to be of lower quality than what we typically see in our classrooms. We found it was more beneficial to watch other videos together, then score and discuss them as a group.
I agree that the Danielson Framework is very helpful and after one year of use, our teachers are much more comfortable with using it to help them plan effective lessons. The Framework was not intended to be used to evaluate teachers, and our District's requirement that we give an overall "score" for each observation makes the teacher more defensive and less interested in partaking in a collegial, self-reflective discussion. Of course, if this was not tied to scoring them on the APPR, they would be less defensive.
Lastly, I'd like to add that there are critically important, observable teacher behaviors in all four domains that result in the student being intrinsically motivated and that intentionally contributes to the student developing a positive self-concept. That is not made clear in the Framework. It is possible and important to identify for our teachers how they can promote motivation, effort, a sense of competence, relatedness and autonomy, in every single competency in the Framework. A superficial reference is made to some of these concepts, but without the depth that is needed in order to truly be Highly Effective.
Some administrators take the critical attributes and examples too literally and do not consider other things, like well established self-concept and self-determination theories, which provide deeper insights into how a teacher can truly influence a student's motivation, effort and choice of behavior. Contact me if you want more information.
In Rochester we are using the updated Danielson framework through teachscape. The teachscape company offered a "certification" program that we had all of our Building Administrators complete. They watched videos that explicated the elements on the rubric and then took an on-line assessment to become :certified."
I think that this has helped with greater interrater reliability, but I would say that continued and regular effort will be required to mainitain a common interpretatiobn of the rubric. I encourge administrators to complete several informal observations anually with other admin, followed by a joint debrief to ensure that we are all interpreting the rubric in a common fashion.
The rubric is very helpful,. but it is dense and (like any rubric) only as good as the common understanding that you develop when you apply and anchor work examples to the rubric.
A year has past since the last post. We are using Danielson for the APPR this year, and I am wondering if those ahead of me have experience to share. How was your first year?
Using the Danielson model in combination with the concept of "evidence-based" data enriches the conversation about practice. The rubric provides clearly defined parameters for each level of instructional quality, and serves as entry points for coaching types of conversations about instruciton and planning. We have found Domain 4 useful in opening dialogue regarding facets of teaching which go beyond the classroom and instruction specifically. When framed effectivley, the opennes of the dialogue contributes to an atmosphere of trust and growth.
Our district has created a hybrid of the Danielson framework with the Indiana RISE framework. Although I would rather go straight Danielson, I do appreciate the fact that the focus through this teacher evaluation framework is on evidence-based practices. Focusing in the evidence gets directly at the quality of learning being implemented in the classroom. The evidence allows for deeper conversations regarding student learning and what specific desirable and undesirable evidence impacts student learning.
One powerful component of the Danielson rubrics, now the Teachscape rubrics, is the emphasis on evidence and artifacts. Rather than making assumptions about the quality of instruction, Danielson calls for a focused look at student work, student behavior, and teacher behavior. Focusing on artifacts allows evaluators to ask questions about instructional decision making and pushes teachers to evaluate and reflect on their own choices. In the five years I have been using the framework, and I still feel like a novice, I have had many very powerful conversations where teachers have looked at evidence from their lessons and provided very powerful reflections that served as the basis for changing and improving their practice.
SUBSCRIBE TO
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 2.0
School Leadership 2.0 is the premier virtual learning community for school leaders from around the globe. Our community is a subscription based paid service ($19.95/year or only $1.99 per month for a trial membership) which will provide school leaders with outstanding resources. Learn more about membership to this service by clicking one our links below.
Click HERE to subscribe as an individual.
Click HERE to learn about group membership (i.e. association, leadership teams)
__________________
CREATE AN EMPLOYER PROFILE AND GET JOB ALERTS AT
SCHOOLLEADERSHIPJOBS.COM
You need to be a member of The Danielson Learning Community to add comments!